MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2005
Barriers to screening infants for retinopathy of prematurity after discharge or transfer from a neonatal intensive care unit.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Attar Mohammad A, Gates Molly R, Iatrow Ann M, Lang Sylvia W, Bratton Susan L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) practices affecting screening and follow-up for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
METHODS: Retrospective study of infants at risk for ROP, eligible for back transport, admitted to a regional NICU from January 1, 1999 until May 31, 2002. Patients failed to receive needed follow-up for ROP after discharge or transfer from a NICU, if we could not verify their ROP screening follow-up within 1 month.
RESULTS: A total of 74 infants were identified to need follow-up eye care. Infants who did not receive the follow-up care had greater mean gestational age (mean SD; 30.7+/-2.3 vs 29.6+/-2.5 weeks, p=0.05) and birth weights (mean SD; 1581+/-366 vs 1360+/-508 g, p=0.007), compared to infants who received the recommended care. Infants transported back to the community hospital were significantly more likely to miss follow-up eye care compared to infants discharged from the regional center (relative risk 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.09 to 7.20)). Infants not screened for ROP in the NICU had greater risk for missing follow-up care compared to infants who had their first retinal examination in the NICU (relative risk 4.25, 95% CI (1.42 to 12.73)).
CONCLUSIONS: Infants transferred back or discharged from the NICU before ROP screening represent a high-risk group for not receiving follow-up eye care.
METHODS: Retrospective study of infants at risk for ROP, eligible for back transport, admitted to a regional NICU from January 1, 1999 until May 31, 2002. Patients failed to receive needed follow-up for ROP after discharge or transfer from a NICU, if we could not verify their ROP screening follow-up within 1 month.
RESULTS: A total of 74 infants were identified to need follow-up eye care. Infants who did not receive the follow-up care had greater mean gestational age (mean SD; 30.7+/-2.3 vs 29.6+/-2.5 weeks, p=0.05) and birth weights (mean SD; 1581+/-366 vs 1360+/-508 g, p=0.007), compared to infants who received the recommended care. Infants transported back to the community hospital were significantly more likely to miss follow-up eye care compared to infants discharged from the regional center (relative risk 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.09 to 7.20)). Infants not screened for ROP in the NICU had greater risk for missing follow-up care compared to infants who had their first retinal examination in the NICU (relative risk 4.25, 95% CI (1.42 to 12.73)).
CONCLUSIONS: Infants transferred back or discharged from the NICU before ROP screening represent a high-risk group for not receiving follow-up eye care.