MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13054-026-06020-x

Медицинская библиотека · Critical care (London, England) · 2026

Admission-day SOFA-2 versus SOFA for mortality discrimination: external validation in a large multicenter ICU database.

Iwasaki Yudai, Kinoshita Takahiro, Yoshimura Jumpei, Maruyama Shuhei, Ohshimo Shinichiro, Murao Shuhei, Watanabe Makoto, Uchida Kenichiro, Igarashi Yutaka, Nishimoto Yuji, Katayama Shinshu, Kurosawa Hiroshi, Inoue Yoshiaki, Kodate Akira, Iyama Keita, Inoue Shigeaki, Kaneda Keisuke, Ito Yusuke, Kobayashi Hirotada, Nakataki Emiko, Shime Nobuaki

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-2 score was developed to better reflect contemporary critical care practice by incorporating modern organ support modalities and updated thresholds based on recent data. However, the generalizability of this framework to intensive care unit (ICU) populations beyond the development cohort, particularly across organ support subgroups and major disease categories, remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the external validity of SOFA-2 using the OneICU database, a large Japanese critical care database with comprehensive domain-level data.

METHODS

Adult ICU stays between February 2013 and August 2025 were included and classified into two cohorts: those with complete SOFA-1 and SOFA-2 component data on the day of ICU admission, and those with complete SOFA-2 data on that day. Discriminatory performance for ICU mortality was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and compared between SOFA-1 and SOFA-2 using the DeLong test. Subgroup analyses were performed by major organ support device use and across disease categories.

RESULTS

Among 152,883 eligible ICU stays, 67,116 had complete SOFA-1 and SOFA-2 data, and 121,443 had complete SOFA-2 data. SOFA-2 showed a slightly higher AUROC for ICU mortality than SOFA-1 (0.859 vs. 0.853; p < 0.001), although the absolute difference was small. Across subgroups defined by mechanical circulatory support use, SOFA-2 showed higher discrimination than SOFA-1. Discrimination was similar in other device-defined subgroups and in patients readmitted to the ICU. SOFA-2 also demonstrated good discrimination across major diagnostic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SOFA-2 showed similar discrimination for ICU mortality compared with SOFA-1 and maintained broadly comparable performance across clinically relevant subgroups, supporting its applicability for early severity assessment in heterogeneous ICU populations.

Для цитирования: Iwasaki Yudai, Kinoshita Takahiro, Yoshimura Jumpei, Maruyama Shuhei, Ohshimo Shinichiro, Murao Shuhei, Watanabe Makoto, Uchida Kenichiro, Igarashi Yutaka, Nishimoto Yuji, Katayama Shinshu, Kurosawa Hiroshi, Inoue Yoshiaki, Kodate Akira, Iyama Keita, Inoue Shigeaki, Kaneda Keisuke, Ito Yusuke, Kobayashi Hirotada, Nakataki Emiko, Shime Nobuaki. Admission-day SOFA-2 versus SOFA for mortality discrimination: external validation in a large multicenter ICU database.. Critical care (London, England). 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-026-06020-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.