MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Managed care interface · 2002

Best practice treatment algorithm for primary open-angle glaucoma: implications for U.S. ophthalmology practice.

Serle Janet, Cantor Louis, Gross Ron, Katz Jay, Mundorf Thomas, Noecker Robert, Severin Todd, Simmons Steve, Walt John, Casciano Julian, Evans Stacy, Doyle John

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The objective of this study was to develop a "best-practice" treatment algorithm for the management of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients receiving initial medical therapy, to serve as a consideration for future ophthalmology practice. For comparison, a baseline, "common-practice" treatment algorithm was also created that reflects current ophthalmology practice patterns. Survey instruments were developed based on a comprehensive review of relevant literature, along with input from a general ophthalmologist. A panel of eight ophthalmologists subspecialized in glaucoma management was surveyed. Consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi technique. A comparison of common- and best-practice treatment algorithms suggests that in contrast with expert opinion, nonselective beta blockers are currently used more often, and alpha-2 agonists less often, as first-line therapy for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Для цитирования: Serle Janet, Cantor Louis, Gross Ron, Katz Jay, Mundorf Thomas, Noecker Robert, Severin Todd, Simmons Steve, Walt John, Casciano Julian, Evans Stacy, Doyle John. Best practice treatment algorithm for primary open-angle glaucoma: implications for U.S. ophthalmology practice.. Managed care interface. 2002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.