Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2025
Nursing consultation protocol for supported self-care for people with Parkinson's disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Couto Alcimar Marcelo do, Alvarez Angela Maria, Tavares Darlene Mara Dos Santos, Tosin Michelle Hyczy de Siqueira, Soares Sônia Maria
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: to develop and validate the content of the Nursing Consultation Protocol for Supported Selfcare in People with Parkinson's Disease.
METHODS: this methodological study was conducted in two stages: protocol development and content validation. Relevance and clarity were assessed using the Delphi technique. After evaluating the protocol instruments, the Content Validity Index was calculated.
RESULTS: an integrative review and a documental study characterizing older people with Parkinson's disease guided the protocol development. The final version comprises 6 sections, 29 topics, and 14 subtopics. The Content Validity Index was high in the first round (0.94) and increased to 0.99 after refinements.
CONCLUSIONS: the expert panel deemed the protocol content valid in terms of relevance and clarity. Further research is recommended to assess its clinical validity.
METHODS: this methodological study was conducted in two stages: protocol development and content validation. Relevance and clarity were assessed using the Delphi technique. After evaluating the protocol instruments, the Content Validity Index was calculated.
RESULTS: an integrative review and a documental study characterizing older people with Parkinson's disease guided the protocol development. The final version comprises 6 sections, 29 topics, and 14 subtopics. The Content Validity Index was high in the first round (0.94) and increased to 0.99 after refinements.
CONCLUSIONS: the expert panel deemed the protocol content valid in terms of relevance and clarity. Further research is recommended to assess its clinical validity.