Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 2011
Refractive outcomes and quality of vision related to an outbreak of diffuse lamellar keratitis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Javaloy Jaime, Alió Jorge L, El Kady Bassam, Muñoz Gonzalo, Barraquer Rafael I, Maldonado Miguel J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report the impact on visual function and corneal aberrations during an epidemic of diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK).
METHODS: A retrospective, comparative, and consecutive case-control study was performed, involving 418 eyes operated between March and October 2007 in the refractive surgery unit of one center. Eyes were separated into groups: group 1 (DLK group) included 209 eyes that presented with DLK after LASIK and group 2 (control group) included 209 unaffected, consecutive eyes operated from the beginning of the outbreak. Refractive variables and corneal aberrations were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Visual outcomes were significantly different when comparing control eyes and eyes with DLK grades 3 and 4, but not for eyes with DLK grades 1 and 2. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) significantly improved from the third month after DLK was diagnosed (Kruskal-Wallis, P=.02). Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) did not decrease significantly with DLK grades 1 and 2 (preoperative CDVA vs 1, 3, and 6 months after diagnosis; Mann-Whitney, P>.05, respectively). At the end of follow-up, UDVA and CDVA were not significantly different between the two groups. Eyes suffering from DLK had significantly increased corneal aberrations, except for spherical and astigmatism aberrations, 3 months after being diagnosed (Kruskal-Wallis, P<.05); however, corneal aberrations were not significantly different between the DLK and control groups (Mann-Whitney, P>.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The outbreak of DLK did not induce a significant decrease in global visual outcomes, except in severe cases, and postoperative corneal aberrations were not affected.
METHODS: A retrospective, comparative, and consecutive case-control study was performed, involving 418 eyes operated between March and October 2007 in the refractive surgery unit of one center. Eyes were separated into groups: group 1 (DLK group) included 209 eyes that presented with DLK after LASIK and group 2 (control group) included 209 unaffected, consecutive eyes operated from the beginning of the outbreak. Refractive variables and corneal aberrations were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Visual outcomes were significantly different when comparing control eyes and eyes with DLK grades 3 and 4, but not for eyes with DLK grades 1 and 2. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) significantly improved from the third month after DLK was diagnosed (Kruskal-Wallis, P=.02). Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) did not decrease significantly with DLK grades 1 and 2 (preoperative CDVA vs 1, 3, and 6 months after diagnosis; Mann-Whitney, P>.05, respectively). At the end of follow-up, UDVA and CDVA were not significantly different between the two groups. Eyes suffering from DLK had significantly increased corneal aberrations, except for spherical and astigmatism aberrations, 3 months after being diagnosed (Kruskal-Wallis, P<.05); however, corneal aberrations were not significantly different between the DLK and control groups (Mann-Whitney, P>.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The outbreak of DLK did not induce a significant decrease in global visual outcomes, except in severe cases, and postoperative corneal aberrations were not affected.