MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1227/01.neu.0000316025.58915.10

Медицинская библиотека · Neurosurgery · 2008

Diplopia after balloon compression of retrogasserian ganglion rootlets for trigeminal neuralgia: technical case report.

Bergenheim A Tommy, Linderoth Bengt

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Balloon compression of the rootlets behind the trigeminal ganglion for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia has become an increasingly popular method among neurosurgeons. However, the method has recognized complications, including double vision. Although occurring infrequently, diplopia may cause the patient significant disability. To minimize the risk for this complication, we analyzed our patients with respect to the surgical technique.

METHODS

We reviewed our joint consecutive series of 193 patients with trigeminal neuralgia treated with balloon compression. The medical records and the intraoperative x-ray images were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified six patients with double vision postoperatively. In analyzing these occurrences, we found that the balloon was inflated outside Meckel's cave in four patients, the balloon was initially inflated too deeply in one patient, and the anatomy of Meckel's cave was probably aberrant in one patient. In five of the six patients, the symptoms resolved within 5 months.

CONCLUSION

By meticulous surgical technique with close attention to the anatomic position and the shape of the inflated balloon, most cases of postcompression diplopia should be avoided.

Для цитирования: Bergenheim A Tommy, Linderoth Bengt. Diplopia after balloon compression of retrogasserian ganglion rootlets for trigeminal neuralgia: technical case report.. Neurosurgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000316025.58915.10.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.