DOI 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.01.014
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Takotsubo Syndrome.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with takotsubo syndrome remain to be defined. The goal of this study was to report the characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients presenting with takotsubo syndrome compared with other patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in a community-based population.
METHODS
This retrospective population-based study included patients hospitalised for AMI from 2006 to 2016. Those patients with takotsubo syndrome were compared with the patients with AMI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Matching was performed to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics.
RESULTS
Among 26,015 patients hospitalised with an initial diagnosis of AMI, 530 (2.0%) were diagnosed with takotsubo syndrome. Patients with takotsubo syndrome were older (68.3 ± 11.3 vs 65.6 ± 12.2 years) and more likely to be women (93.4% vs 30.7%). Concomitant hypothyroidism, rheumatologic disorders, and lung disease were more prevalent in the takotsubo syndrome group, whereas diabetes and hyperlipidemia were less prevalent. Mortality was lower in the takotsubo syndrome group (1-year mortality 4.0% vs 8.9%; P < 0.001). The 530 patients with takotsubo syndrome were matched with 1,315 AMI patients with similar baseline characteristics. At a follow-up of 5.4 ± 3.3 years, patients with takotsubo syndrome had a lower risk for all-cause death than other patients who presented with AMI (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.76).
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients presenting with AMI, patients with takotsubo syndrome were older and more likely to be women. Patients with takotsubo syndrome had better long-term outcomes compared with matched AMI patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.