MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/112067219700700211

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of ophthalmology · 1997

Is tear calcium an indicator of ocular calcification in patients with chronic renal failure?

Oto S, Aydin P, Haberal A, Dursun D, Yilmaz A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) on regular dialysis treatment, limboconjunctival degeneration and calcifications are common. The mechanisms of ectopic conjunctival and corneal calcification remain largely speculative. The aim of the present work was to study tear calcium levels in patients with chronic renal failure, which could alter calcium excretion patterns, and to examine whether the calcium level in tear fluid is of more diagnostic importance than static calcium levels in blood.

METHODS

Tear calcium levels were measured in 25 patients with chronic renal failure, compared with 14 normal subjects. Conjunctival and corneal calcium deposits were graded by the Porter and Crombie classification.

RESULTS

While 11 of the 25 patients had no clinically apparent calcium deposits, six had Grade 1 or 2, and eight had Grade 3 and over limboconjunctival calcification. Mean tear calcium levels were 1.436 +/- 0.165 mg/dl in the patients and 1.307 +/- 0.155 mg/dl in the normal group. The difference was not significant (P = 0.572). No correlation was found between the grade of the calcium deposits and tear calcium levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Tear calcium level has no diagnostic importance for the development of ocular calcification in chronic renal failure.

Для цитирования: Oto S, Aydin P, Haberal A, Dursun D, Yilmaz A. Is tear calcium an indicator of ocular calcification in patients with chronic renal failure?. European journal of ophthalmology. 1997. DOI: 10.1177/112067219700700211.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.