MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/09638280902887768

Медицинская библиотека · Disability and rehabilitation · 2009

Systematic review of the effectiveness of mirror therapy in upper extremity function.

Ezendam Daniëlle, Bongers Raoul M, Jannink Michiel J A

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This review gives an overview of the current state of research regarding the effectiveness of mirror therapy in upper extremity function.

METHOD: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies concerning mirror therapy in upper extremity. The included journal articles were reviewed according to a structured diagram and the methodological quality was assessed.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were identified and reviewed. Five different patient categories were studied: two studies focussed on mirror therapy after an amputation of the upper limb, five studies focussed on mirror therapy after stroke, five studies focussed on mirror therapy with complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS1) patients, one study on mirror therapy with complex regional pain syndrome type 2 (CRPS2) and two studies focussed on mirror therapy after hand surgery other than amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the evidence for mirror therapy is from studies with weak methodological quality. The present review showed a trend that mirror therapy is effective in upper limb treatment of stroke patients and patients with CRPS, whereas the effectiveness in other patient groups has yet to be determined.

Для цитирования: Ezendam Daniëlle, Bongers Raoul M, Jannink Michiel J A. Systematic review of the effectiveness of mirror therapy in upper extremity function.. Disability and rehabilitation. 2009. DOI: 10.3109/09638280902887768.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.