European heart journal · 2009
Diagnosing vasovagal syncope based on quantitative history-taking: validation of the Calgary Syncope Symptom Score.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Romme Jacobus J C M, van Dijk Nynke, Boer Kimberly R, Bossuyt Patrick M M, Wieling Wouter, Reitsma Johannes B
Аннотация
AIMS: It can be difficult to distinguish vasovagal syncope, the most common cause of transient loss of consciousness (T-LOC), from other causes of syncope by history taking. The Calgary Syncope Symptom Score (Calgary Score) is a tool developed for this purpose. We studied its performance in a series of patients presenting with T-LOC.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We calculated the Calgary Score for 380 patients presenting with T-LOC to a number of departments of our university hospital. Diagnoses of vasovagal syncope based on the Calgary Score were then compared with the final diagnosis, obtained after additional testing and 2 years of follow-up. The sensitivity of the Calgary Score was 87% (95% CI: 82-91%), at a specificity of 32% (95% CI: 24-40%). Most items of the Calgary Score were less discriminative in our study group than in the original population. Incorrectly labelling patients with syncope as vasovagal was most common in patients with psychogenic pseudosyncope (specificity 21%) but also occurred in patients with cardiac syncope (specificity 32%).
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of the Calgary Score was comparable with the one in the original study, but its specificity was much lower, limiting its value in patients presenting with T-LOC in a general hospital setting.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We calculated the Calgary Score for 380 patients presenting with T-LOC to a number of departments of our university hospital. Diagnoses of vasovagal syncope based on the Calgary Score were then compared with the final diagnosis, obtained after additional testing and 2 years of follow-up. The sensitivity of the Calgary Score was 87% (95% CI: 82-91%), at a specificity of 32% (95% CI: 24-40%). Most items of the Calgary Score were less discriminative in our study group than in the original population. Incorrectly labelling patients with syncope as vasovagal was most common in patients with psychogenic pseudosyncope (specificity 21%) but also occurred in patients with cardiac syncope (specificity 32%).
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of the Calgary Score was comparable with the one in the original study, but its specificity was much lower, limiting its value in patients presenting with T-LOC in a general hospital setting.