MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/07347332.2019.1600628

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of psychosocial oncology · 2019

The role of rumination in posttraumatic growth in people struggling with cancer.

Ogińska-Bulik Nina, Kobylarczyk Magdalena

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Introduction

Cognitive processes, especially ruminations, play an important role in the emergence of the consequences of experienced traumatic events. The aim of the present study was to establish whether in people struggling with cancer there is an association between the degree of PTG and the level of deliberate and intrusive ruminations, occurring soon after the diagnosis of disease and currently, and whether deliberate ruminations play a mediating role between intrusive ruminations and PTG.

Methods

The results of a survey of 71 persons with various kinds of cancer, aged 19-67 years (M = 48.63; SD = 12.71) were analyzed. The majority of respondents (60.57%) were women. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory and the Event Related Rumination Inventory were used in the study.

Results

The results indicated the presence of positive posttraumatic changes in the examined group. The results of mediation analyses indicate that current deliberate ruminations play a mediating role in the relationship between intrusive ruminations (soon after the event) and appreciation of life and between deliberate ruminations (soon after the event) and changes in relating to others.

Conclusions

Encouraging people struggling with cancer to ruminate may foster growth after trauma.

Для цитирования: Ogińska-Bulik Nina, Kobylarczyk Magdalena. The role of rumination in posttraumatic growth in people struggling with cancer.. Journal of psychosocial oncology. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2019.1600628.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.