Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 2024
Application of a New Hemostatic Clip to Prevent Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Sphincterotomy: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dong Jinpei, Feng Qiushi, Teng Guigen, Niu Haixia, Bian Dapeng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Delayed bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is a serious adverse event of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of prevent delayed bleeding of hemostatic clip (Sureclip) after ES.
METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with common bile duct stones with a high risk of delayed bleeding who received ES from January 1, 2013, to July 31, 2022, were analyzed retrospectively. A 1:1 propensity score-matching analysis and logistic regression analysis were used. The patients were allocated into the hemostatic clip and control groups. The rate of delayed bleeding, hyperamylasemia, pancreatitis, and hemostatic clip closing the bile duct or pancreatic duct by mistake were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Overall, 161 and 232 patients were allocated to the control and hemostatic clip groups, respectively, propensity score matching created 120 matched pairs. The rate of delayed bleeding was significantly lower in the hemostatic clip group than in the control group (1.67% vs. 7.5%, P =0.031). After adjusting for confounding factors, logistic regression showed hemostatic clip was associated with decreased odds of delayed bleeding (0.134, 95% CI: 0.025-0.719). No case of hemostatic clip closing the bile duct or pancreatic duct by mistake occurred in the hemostatic clip group. No significant differences were observed in postoperative hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that the prophylactic application of a hemostatic clip is associated with a significantly reduced rate of delayed bleeding after ES in high-risk patients. This approach did not increase the risk of adverse event.
METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with common bile duct stones with a high risk of delayed bleeding who received ES from January 1, 2013, to July 31, 2022, were analyzed retrospectively. A 1:1 propensity score-matching analysis and logistic regression analysis were used. The patients were allocated into the hemostatic clip and control groups. The rate of delayed bleeding, hyperamylasemia, pancreatitis, and hemostatic clip closing the bile duct or pancreatic duct by mistake were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Overall, 161 and 232 patients were allocated to the control and hemostatic clip groups, respectively, propensity score matching created 120 matched pairs. The rate of delayed bleeding was significantly lower in the hemostatic clip group than in the control group (1.67% vs. 7.5%, P =0.031). After adjusting for confounding factors, logistic regression showed hemostatic clip was associated with decreased odds of delayed bleeding (0.134, 95% CI: 0.025-0.719). No case of hemostatic clip closing the bile duct or pancreatic duct by mistake occurred in the hemostatic clip group. No significant differences were observed in postoperative hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that the prophylactic application of a hemostatic clip is associated with a significantly reduced rate of delayed bleeding after ES in high-risk patients. This approach did not increase the risk of adverse event.