MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000357784

Медицинская библиотека · Psychopathology · 2014

Epidemiology, course and outcome of acute polymorphic psychotic disorder: implications for ICD-11.

Castagnini Augusto, Foldager Leslie

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The proposed revision of the ICD-10 category of 'acute and transient psychotic disorders' (ATPDs), subsuming polymorphic, schizophrenic or predominantly delusional syndromes, would restrict their classification to acute polymorphic psychotic disorder, reminiscent of the clinical concepts of bouffée délirante and cycloid psychosis.

SAMPLING AND

METHODS

We selected all subjects aged 15-64 years (n = 5,426) who were listed in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register with a first-admission diagnosis of ATPDs in 1995-2008 and estimated incidence rates, course and outcome up to 2010.

RESULTS

Although about half of ATPD patients tended to experience transition to another category over a mean follow-up period of 9.3 years, acute polymorphic psychotic disorder fared better in terms of cases with a single episode of psychosis and temporal stability than the subtypes featuring schizophrenic or predominantly delusional symptoms. Acute polymorphic psychotic disorder was more common in females, while cases with acute schizophrenic features predominated in younger males and evolved more often into schizophrenia and related disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that acute polymorphic psychotic disorder exhibits distinctive features and challenge the current approach to the classification of ATPDs.

Для цитирования: Castagnini Augusto, Foldager Leslie. Epidemiology, course and outcome of acute polymorphic psychotic disorder: implications for ICD-11.. Psychopathology. 2014. DOI: 10.1159/000357784.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.