Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
The efficacy of low-dose CT with deep learning image reconstruction in the surveillance of incidentally detected pancreatic cystic lesions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koh Sungho, Lee Nam Kyung, Kim Suk, Hong Seung Baek, Kim Dong Uk, Han Sung Yong
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of low-dose CT (LDCT) with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for the surveillance of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) compared with standard-dose CT (SDCT) with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V).
METHODS: The study enrolled 103 patients who underwent pancreatic CT for follow-up of incidentally detected PCLs. The CT protocol included LDCT in the pancreatic phase with 40% ASIR-V, DLIR at medium (DLIR-M) and high levels (DLIR-H), and SDCT in the portal-venous phase with 40% ASIR-V. The overall image quality and conspicuity of PCLs were qualitatively assessed using five-point scales by two radiologists. The size of PCLs, presence of thickened/enhancing walls, enhancing mural nodules, and main pancreatic duct dilatation were reviewed. CT noise and cyst-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were analyzed using the chi-squared test, one-way ANOVA, and t-test. Additionally, interobserver agreement was analyzed using the kappa and weighted-kappa statistics.
RESULTS: The volume CT dose-indexes in LDCT and SDCT were 3.0 ± 0.6 mGy and 8.4 ± 2.9 mGy, respectively. LDCT with DLIR-H showed the highest overall image quality, the lowest noise, and the highest CNR. The PCL conspicuity in LDCT with either DLIR-M or DLIR-H was not significantly different from that in SDCT with ASIR-V. Other findings depicting PCLs also revealed no significant differences between LDCT with DLIR and SDCT with ASIR-V. Moreover, the results revealed good or excellent interobserver agreement.
CONCLUSION: LDCT with DLIR has a comparable performance with SDCT for the follow-up of incidentally detected PCLs.
METHODS: The study enrolled 103 patients who underwent pancreatic CT for follow-up of incidentally detected PCLs. The CT protocol included LDCT in the pancreatic phase with 40% ASIR-V, DLIR at medium (DLIR-M) and high levels (DLIR-H), and SDCT in the portal-venous phase with 40% ASIR-V. The overall image quality and conspicuity of PCLs were qualitatively assessed using five-point scales by two radiologists. The size of PCLs, presence of thickened/enhancing walls, enhancing mural nodules, and main pancreatic duct dilatation were reviewed. CT noise and cyst-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were analyzed using the chi-squared test, one-way ANOVA, and t-test. Additionally, interobserver agreement was analyzed using the kappa and weighted-kappa statistics.
RESULTS: The volume CT dose-indexes in LDCT and SDCT were 3.0 ± 0.6 mGy and 8.4 ± 2.9 mGy, respectively. LDCT with DLIR-H showed the highest overall image quality, the lowest noise, and the highest CNR. The PCL conspicuity in LDCT with either DLIR-M or DLIR-H was not significantly different from that in SDCT with ASIR-V. Other findings depicting PCLs also revealed no significant differences between LDCT with DLIR and SDCT with ASIR-V. Moreover, the results revealed good or excellent interobserver agreement.
CONCLUSION: LDCT with DLIR has a comparable performance with SDCT for the follow-up of incidentally detected PCLs.