MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2016.01.049

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the neurological sciences · 2016

Transorbital sonography in CIDP patients: No evidence for optic nerve hypertrophy.

Krogias Christos, Ayzenberg Ilya, Schroeder Christoph, Grüter Thomas, Gold Ralf, Yoon Min-Suk

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired, chronic progressive or relapsing immune mediated disorder of the peripheral nervous system. Thickening of cranial nerves as a sign of central nerve involvement is increasingly reported in the last years. Our aim was to assess systematically for the first time the frequency of optic nerve hypertrophy in patients with CIDP by means of transorbital sonography (TOS). Thirty-four optic nerves of 17 patients with CIDP (age=60.8±13.3y, range=39-82y; 7 female) were examined by TOS. The diameter of Optic nerve (OND) as well as the intern and extern diameters of the sheath (ONDSi, ONSDe) was measured 3mm behind the optic disc. Findings were compared to the data of 15 healthy controls. CIDP-patients showed a mean OND of 2.8±0.4mm, an ONSDi of 4.7±0.7mm, and an ONSDe of 6.3±0.9mm. No papilledema was detectable. There was no significant difference to the healthy control group. Our study revealed no evidence for a frequent optic nerve involvement in CIDP. Reported cases seem to represent exceptions. Transorbital sonography could be a useful tool in these rare cases with optic nerve hypertrophy.

Для цитирования: Krogias Christos, Ayzenberg Ilya, Schroeder Christoph, Grüter Thomas, Gold Ralf, Yoon Min-Suk. Transorbital sonography in CIDP patients: No evidence for optic nerve hypertrophy.. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.01.049.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.