Impact of the Updated Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2025 Criteria on the Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Sarcopenic Obesity in Older Patients With Heart Failure.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) updated its diagnostic criteria in 2025 by incorporating body mass index (BMI)-adjusted skeletal muscle mass. This revision may influence the prevalence and clinical interpretation of sarcopenic obesity in heart failure (HF).
METHODS AND
RESULTS
We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 589 patients aged ≥65 years who were hospitalized for HF. Application of the AWGS 2025 criteria significantly altered classification, increasing the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity from 7.8% to 13.6%. Among the 4 groups defined by sarcopenia (AWGS 2025) and obesity, patients with sarcopenia without obesity had the worst prognosis, whereas those with sarcopenic obesity had preserved survival (log-rank P=0.038). Following the transition from the AWGS 2019 to AWGS 2025 criteria, newly classified patients with sarcopenic obesity were more frequently female and had a higher BMI with preserved height-adjusted muscle mass compared with patients with persistent sarcopenic obesity. Mortality and gait speed were comparable between the persistent and newly classified sarcopenic obesity groups (both P>0.05). The AWGS 2025 sarcopenia-obesity phenotype classification showed no improvement in discrimination or the Akaike information criterion for prognosis compared with the AWGS 2019 classification (both P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The AWGS 2025 criteria increase the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity by identifying a distinct phenotype in patients with HF. However, this expanded classification does not improve risk stratification.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.