The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2021
Stress Echocardiography After Mitral Valve Repair Using a Semirigid Partial Band.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamazaki Sachiko, Doi Kiyoshi, Numata Satoshi, Yamano Tetsuhiro, Yamano Michiyo, Teramukai Satoshi, Yaku Hitoshi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The reduction in exercise capacity after mitral valve repair (MVr) for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation is an unsolved issue. This study aimed to evaluate hemodynamics after MVr using a partial semirigid band during exercise stress echocardiography and to identify predictive factors for achieving better exercise capacity after MVr.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients using exercise stress echocardiography within 5 years of having undergone MVr using a partial semirigid band between 2013 and 2019. Values of maximal workload were converted into numbers of metabolic equivalents (METs) achieved for each patient. Age and sex expected METs (eMETs) were obtained, and percent eMETs (%eMETs [achieved METs / eMETs × 100]) were calculated. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to identify the determinants of %eMETs.
RESULTS: Only one third of patients achieved eMETs. Significant determinants of %eMETs were age at exercise stress echocardiography (β coefficient 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.96; P < .001), female sex (β coefficient 16.9; 95% confidence interval, 8.58 to 25.17; P < .001), and larger indexed device size (device size/body surface area; β coefficient 4.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.74 to 6.46; P = .001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a cutoff value of 19.5 mm/m2 or greater indexed device size was optimal for achieving %eMETs greater than 100%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 79%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with larger indexed device size achieved greater exercise capacity after MVr using a partial semirigid band. Preoperative evaluation to decide whether we can use an annuloplasty device larger than 19.5 mm/m2 may be important for patients who intend to exercise with high intensity.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients using exercise stress echocardiography within 5 years of having undergone MVr using a partial semirigid band between 2013 and 2019. Values of maximal workload were converted into numbers of metabolic equivalents (METs) achieved for each patient. Age and sex expected METs (eMETs) were obtained, and percent eMETs (%eMETs [achieved METs / eMETs × 100]) were calculated. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to identify the determinants of %eMETs.
RESULTS: Only one third of patients achieved eMETs. Significant determinants of %eMETs were age at exercise stress echocardiography (β coefficient 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.96; P < .001), female sex (β coefficient 16.9; 95% confidence interval, 8.58 to 25.17; P < .001), and larger indexed device size (device size/body surface area; β coefficient 4.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.74 to 6.46; P = .001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a cutoff value of 19.5 mm/m2 or greater indexed device size was optimal for achieving %eMETs greater than 100%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 79%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with larger indexed device size achieved greater exercise capacity after MVr using a partial semirigid band. Preoperative evaluation to decide whether we can use an annuloplasty device larger than 19.5 mm/m2 may be important for patients who intend to exercise with high intensity.