Mitral Annular Dynamics in AF Versus Sinus Rhythm: Novel Insights Into the Mechanism of AFMR.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate mitral annular dynamics in atrial fibrillation (AF) and after sinus rhythm restoration, and to assess the relationship between annular dynamics and mitral regurgitation (MR).

BACKGROUND

AF can be associated with MR that improves after sinus rhythm restoration. Mechanisms underlying this atrial functional MR (AFMR) are ill-understood and generally attributed to left atrial remodeling.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with persistent AF and normal left ventricular ejection fraction were prospectively examined by means of 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography before, immediately after, and 6 weeks after electric cardioversion to sinus rhythm. Annular motion was assessed during AF and in sinus rhythm with the use of 3-dimensional analysis software, and the relationship with MR severity was explored.

RESULTS

During AF and immediately after sinus rhythm restoration, the mitral annulus behaved relatively adynamically, with an overall change in annular area of 10.3% (95% CI: 8.7%-11.8%) and 12.2% (95% CI: 10.6%-13.8%), respectively. At follow-up, a significant increase in annular dynamics (19.0%; 95% CI: 17.4%-20.6%; P < 0.001) was observed, owing predominantly to an increase in presystolic contraction (P < 0.001). The effective regurgitant orifice area decreased from 0.15 cm2 (0.10-0.23 cm2) during AF to 0.09 cm2 (0.05-0.12 cm2) at follow-up (P < 0.001) in the total cohort, and from 0.27 (0.23-0.33) to 0.16 (0.12-0.29) in the subgroup with effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) ≥0.20 cm2. The change in presystolic annular motion was the only independent determinant of the decrease in MR severity (P = 0.027), by optimizing annular-leaflet imbalance. Patients with more pronounced blunting of presystolic dynamics had a higher EROA (P < 0.001), because of a lower total-to-closed leaflet area ratio (P < 0.001) at each point in time. This ratio was the strongest independent determinant of AFMR severity (adjusted P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral annular dynamics are impaired in AF, with blunted presystolic narrowing that contributes to AFMR. Sinus rhythm restoration allows gradual recovery of presystolic annular dynamics. Improved annular dynamics decrease AFMR severity by optimizing annular-leaflet imbalance, regardless of LA remodeling.