Journal of anxiety disorders · 2022
The OCI-CV-R: A Revision of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory - Child Version.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abramovitch Amitai, Abramowitz Jonathan S, McKay Dean, Cham Heining, Anderson Kennedy S, Farrell Lara, Geller Daniel A, Hanna Gregory L, Mathieu Sharna, McGuire Joseph F, Rosenberg David R, Stewart S Evelyn, Storch Eric A, Wilhelm Sabine
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Children's Version (OCI-CV) was developed to assess obsessive-compulsive symptoms in youth. Recent changes in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) exclude hoarding from inclusion in the diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Accordingly, the present study examined the reliability, validity, factorial structure, and diagnostic sensitivity of a revised version of the scale - the OCI-CV-R- that excludes items assessing hoarding.
METHODS: Participant were 1047 youth, including 489 meeting DSM criteria for primary OCD, 298 clinical controls, and 260 nonclinical controls, who completed the OCI-CV and measures of obsessive-compulsive symptom severity, depression, and anxiety at various treatment and research centers.
RESULTS: Findings support a five-factor structure (doubting/checking, obsessing, washing, ordering, and neutralizing), with a higher order factor. Factorial invariance was found for older (12-17 years) and younger (7-11 years) children. Internal consistency of the OCI-CV-R was acceptable, and discriminant and convergent validity were adequate and akin to that of its progenitor. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were found for a total score of 8 and higher.
CONCLUSION: It is recommended that the OCI-CV-R replace the former version, and that this measure serve as part of a comprehensive clinical assessment of youth with OCD. Recommendations for further research with ethnically and racially diverse samples, as well as the need to establish benchmark scores are discussed.
METHODS: Participant were 1047 youth, including 489 meeting DSM criteria for primary OCD, 298 clinical controls, and 260 nonclinical controls, who completed the OCI-CV and measures of obsessive-compulsive symptom severity, depression, and anxiety at various treatment and research centers.
RESULTS: Findings support a five-factor structure (doubting/checking, obsessing, washing, ordering, and neutralizing), with a higher order factor. Factorial invariance was found for older (12-17 years) and younger (7-11 years) children. Internal consistency of the OCI-CV-R was acceptable, and discriminant and convergent validity were adequate and akin to that of its progenitor. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were found for a total score of 8 and higher.
CONCLUSION: It is recommended that the OCI-CV-R replace the former version, and that this measure serve as part of a comprehensive clinical assessment of youth with OCD. Recommendations for further research with ethnically and racially diverse samples, as well as the need to establish benchmark scores are discussed.