Characterization of Seasonal Trivalent Influenza Vaccine Formulated with Different Ratios (v/v) of Squalene-Containing IB160 Adjuvant in One- or Two-Vial Presentations.

BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVES

Adjuvanted influenza vaccines are critical to enhance immune responses in high-risk populations, such as the elderly. While initial studies relied on a two-vial system with antigen and adjuvant mixing prior to immunization, this study evaluated the feasibility, immunogenicity, and 12-month stability of a one-vial formulation combining a Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TIV) with the locally produced squalene-based oil-in-water emulsion IB160.

METHODS

Formulations were evaluated by testing TIV:IB160 (v/v) ratios (1:1, 2:1, 3:1) in an animal model, measuring HI antibodies as the primary immunogenicity metric, complemented by qualitative strain-specific total IgG screening by ELISA. One-vial and two-vial strategies were also compared regarding immune responses. Formulations stabilities were evaluated at 6.0 °C ± 2.0 °C in one-and two-vial systems by monitoring physicochemical features and their antigenic responses, measuring hemagglutinin content of the formulated vaccines, and long-term HI antibody responses.

RESULTS

The 2:1 and 1:1 (v/v) formulation ratios (15 µg TIV:IB160) induced significantly higher HI titers across all tested strains (A/H3N2/Thailand, A/H1N1/Victoria, and B/Austria) when compared to non-adjuvanted TIV or adjuvanted TIV in the 3:1 ratio. Both the one and two-vial strategies showed significantly higher HI antibody responses than the non-adjuvanted control group (p < 0.05), with no significant differences observed between the delivery formats. Indeed, the one-vial formulation with 1:1 and 2:1 ratios remained stable for 12 months, preserving TIV antigenicity, IB160 emulsion integrity, and robust immunogenicity.

CONCLUSIONS

One- and two-vial formulations are viable, stable, and highly immunogenic alternatives for adjuvanted TIV in 2:1 and 1:1 (v/v) formulation ratios (15 µg TIV:IB160). One-vial format simplifies immunization logistics, minimizes operational errors, and is more indicated for routine use, while the two-vial system remains a versatile asset for emergency responses.