The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
GIP Receptor Antagonism Eliminates Paradoxical Growth Hormone Secretion in Some Patients With Acromegaly.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jensen Mette H, Gasbjerg Lærke S, Skov-Jeppesen Kirsa, Jacobsen Jens C B, Poulsen Steen S, Zhou Cuiqi, Jakubauskaite Ruta, Poulsen Frantz R, Bonde Christian, Albarazi Mahmoud, Halle Bo, Christiansen Charlotte B, Sanni Samra J, Byberg Sarah, Hoe Bjørn, Holst Jens J, Dela Flemming, Rasmussen Aase K, Knop Filip K, Arlien-Søborg Mai C, Melmed Shlomo, Jørgensen Jens Otto L, Andersen Marianne S, Hartmann Bolette, Klose Marianne C, Feldt-Rasmussen Ulla, Sparre-Ulrich Alexander H, Rosenkilde Mette M
Аннотация
CONTEXT: About 30% of patients with active acromegaly experience paradoxically increased growth hormone (GH) secretion during the diagnostic oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Endogenous glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is implicated in this paradoxical secretion.
OBJECTIVE: We used the GIP receptor (GIPR) antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2 to test the hypothesis that GIP mediates this paradoxical response when GIPR is abundantly expressed in somatotropinomas.
METHODS: A total of 25 treatment-naive patients with acromegaly were enrolled. Each patient underwent one OGTT during simultaneous placebo infusion and one OGTT during a GIP(3-30)NH2 infusion. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and regularly after infusions to measure GH. We assessed pituitary adenoma size by magnetic resonance imaging and GIPR expression by immunohistochemistry on resected somatotropinomas. For mechanistic confirmation, we applied in vitro and ex vivo approaches. The main outcome measure was the effect of GIP(3-30)NH2 on paradoxical GH secretion during OGTT as a measure of GIP involvement.
RESULTS: In 4 of 7 patients with paradoxical GH secretion, GIP(3-30)NH2 infusion completely abolished the paradoxical response (P = .0003). Somatotrophs were available from 3 of 4 of these patients, all showing abundant GIPR expression. Adenoma size did not differ between patients with and without paradoxical GH secretion.
CONCLUSION: Of 25 patients with acromegaly, 7 had paradoxical GH secretion during OGTT, and pharmaceutical GIPR blockade abolished this secretion in 4. Corresponding somatotroph adenomas abundantly expressed GIPR, suggesting a therapeutic target in this subpopulation of patients. In vitro and ex vivo analyses confirmed the role of GIP and the effects of the antagonist.
OBJECTIVE: We used the GIP receptor (GIPR) antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2 to test the hypothesis that GIP mediates this paradoxical response when GIPR is abundantly expressed in somatotropinomas.
METHODS: A total of 25 treatment-naive patients with acromegaly were enrolled. Each patient underwent one OGTT during simultaneous placebo infusion and one OGTT during a GIP(3-30)NH2 infusion. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and regularly after infusions to measure GH. We assessed pituitary adenoma size by magnetic resonance imaging and GIPR expression by immunohistochemistry on resected somatotropinomas. For mechanistic confirmation, we applied in vitro and ex vivo approaches. The main outcome measure was the effect of GIP(3-30)NH2 on paradoxical GH secretion during OGTT as a measure of GIP involvement.
RESULTS: In 4 of 7 patients with paradoxical GH secretion, GIP(3-30)NH2 infusion completely abolished the paradoxical response (P = .0003). Somatotrophs were available from 3 of 4 of these patients, all showing abundant GIPR expression. Adenoma size did not differ between patients with and without paradoxical GH secretion.
CONCLUSION: Of 25 patients with acromegaly, 7 had paradoxical GH secretion during OGTT, and pharmaceutical GIPR blockade abolished this secretion in 4. Corresponding somatotroph adenomas abundantly expressed GIPR, suggesting a therapeutic target in this subpopulation of patients. In vitro and ex vivo analyses confirmed the role of GIP and the effects of the antagonist.