Research square · 2024
Dynamic X-ray Microtomography vs. Laser-Doppler Vibrometry: A Comparative Study.
СтатьяПрепринтНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ivanovic Aleksandra, Cheng Jeffrey Tao, Schmeltz Margaux, Schlepütz Christian M, Bonnin Anne, Anschuetz Lukas
Аннотация
PURPOSE: There are challenges in understanding the biomechanics of the human middle ear, and established methods for studying this system show significant limitations. In this study, we evaluate a novel dynamic imaging technique based on synchrotron X-ray microtomography designed to assess the biomechanical properties of the human middle ear by comparing it to laser-Doppler vibrometry (LDV).
METHODS: We examined three fresh-frozen temporal bones (TB) using dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography for 256 Hz and 512 Hz, stimulated at 110 dB and 120 dB SPL. In addition, we performed measurements on these TBs using 1D LDV, a well-established method.
RESULTS: The normalized displacement values (μm/Pa) at the umbo and the posterior crus of the stapes are consistent or within 5-10 dB differences between all LDV and dynamic microtomography measurements and previously reported literature references. In general, the overall behavior is similar between the two measurement techniques.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results demonstrate the suitability of dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography in studying the middle ear's biomechanics. However, this study shows that better standardization regarding acoustic stimulation and measurement points is needed to better compare the two measurement techniques.
METHODS: We examined three fresh-frozen temporal bones (TB) using dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography for 256 Hz and 512 Hz, stimulated at 110 dB and 120 dB SPL. In addition, we performed measurements on these TBs using 1D LDV, a well-established method.
RESULTS: The normalized displacement values (μm/Pa) at the umbo and the posterior crus of the stapes are consistent or within 5-10 dB differences between all LDV and dynamic microtomography measurements and previously reported literature references. In general, the overall behavior is similar between the two measurement techniques.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results demonstrate the suitability of dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography in studying the middle ear's biomechanics. However, this study shows that better standardization regarding acoustic stimulation and measurement points is needed to better compare the two measurement techniques.