Radiography (London, England : 1995) · 2025
Effect of iodinated contrast media enhancement on size-specific dose estimates in emergency thoracic CT.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khallouqi A, Sekkat H, Halimi A, Madkouri Y, El Rhazouani O
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Accurate estimation of patient radiation dose is crucial in emergency computed tomography (CT), where rapid multiphase imaging is routine. The Size-Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE) incorporates patient size using the water-equivalent diameter (Dw), but standard calculations assume patient size remains constant across scan phases. Contrast administration, however, modifies tissue attenuation and may alter both Dw and SSDE.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive emergency thoracic CT examinations was conducted, each including non-contrast (C-) and contrast-enhanced (C+) phases. Automatic tube-current modulation was applied for all acquisitions. From 22,000 slice-level observations, the scanner-reported volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), Dw, size-specific conversion factor (f), and SSDE were calculated using AAPM-recommended equations. Phase-wise comparisons were performed using paired t-tests.
RESULTS: Mean SSDE increased from 11.64 ± 1.11 mGy (C-) to 11.96 ± 1.17 mGy (C+), a statistically significant 2.7 % rise (p < 0.001). The apparent cause was a 3.4 % decrease in Dw (21.98 mm → 21.24 mm, p < 0.001), reflecting higher post-contrast attenuation interpreted as smaller patient size. This led to a 2.8 % increase in f, further amplified by the scanner's compensatory increase in tube current.
CONCLUSION: SSDE is a dynamic rather than static parameter, increasing systematically during contrast-enhanced thoracic CT because of both algorithmic artefacts and real modulation of scanner output. Reliance on a single averaged SSDE across multiphase protocols may underestimate patient dose.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Phase-specific SSDE reporting provides a more accurate and transparent assessment of patient radiation exposure in emergency CT. Integrating automated, phase-resolved SSDE computation into dose-management systems would enhance clinical decision-making, support protocol optimization, and improve adherence to the ALARA principle in daily radiology practice.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive emergency thoracic CT examinations was conducted, each including non-contrast (C-) and contrast-enhanced (C+) phases. Automatic tube-current modulation was applied for all acquisitions. From 22,000 slice-level observations, the scanner-reported volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), Dw, size-specific conversion factor (f), and SSDE were calculated using AAPM-recommended equations. Phase-wise comparisons were performed using paired t-tests.
RESULTS: Mean SSDE increased from 11.64 ± 1.11 mGy (C-) to 11.96 ± 1.17 mGy (C+), a statistically significant 2.7 % rise (p < 0.001). The apparent cause was a 3.4 % decrease in Dw (21.98 mm → 21.24 mm, p < 0.001), reflecting higher post-contrast attenuation interpreted as smaller patient size. This led to a 2.8 % increase in f, further amplified by the scanner's compensatory increase in tube current.
CONCLUSION: SSDE is a dynamic rather than static parameter, increasing systematically during contrast-enhanced thoracic CT because of both algorithmic artefacts and real modulation of scanner output. Reliance on a single averaged SSDE across multiphase protocols may underestimate patient dose.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Phase-specific SSDE reporting provides a more accurate and transparent assessment of patient radiation exposure in emergency CT. Integrating automated, phase-resolved SSDE computation into dose-management systems would enhance clinical decision-making, support protocol optimization, and improve adherence to the ALARA principle in daily radiology practice.