Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia · 2003
[Subclinical keratoconus diagnosis by elevation topography].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arntz A, Durán J A, Pijoán J I
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the most effective parameters of Orbscan Corneal Topography System for subclinical keratoconus screening.
METHODS: The study includes corneas from patients with clinical diagnosis of keratoconus (group 1, n=35), patients with subclinical keratoconus (group 2, n=14) and a control group of myopic subjects paired in gender, age and refractive spherical equivalent (group 3, n=35). Placement of the apex, anterior and posterior corneal elevation, minimal corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth and corneal diameter were evaluated.
RESULTS: The most frequent location of the apex was at the inferotemporal sector (53%). Mean anterior elevation was 56.73 S.D. 25.95 mm in group 1 and 20.35 S.D. 8.04 mm in group 2; results that are statistically significant different from the control group (p<0.001). Mean posterior elevation was 126.23 S.D. 57.7 mm in group 1 and 54.28 S.D. 19.55 mm in group 2, both showing a statistically significant difference from the control group (p<0.001). Minimal corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth also showed statistically significant differences between the three groups. No differences were found in corneal diameter values.
CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant differences were found in anterior and posterior elevation, minimal corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth parameters, as measured by the Orbscan system, between normal myopic subjects and those with clinical and sub-clinical keratoconus. These parameters should be considered in the detection of patients with increased risk for developing secondary keratectasia following corneal refractive surgery.
METHODS: The study includes corneas from patients with clinical diagnosis of keratoconus (group 1, n=35), patients with subclinical keratoconus (group 2, n=14) and a control group of myopic subjects paired in gender, age and refractive spherical equivalent (group 3, n=35). Placement of the apex, anterior and posterior corneal elevation, minimal corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth and corneal diameter were evaluated.
RESULTS: The most frequent location of the apex was at the inferotemporal sector (53%). Mean anterior elevation was 56.73 S.D. 25.95 mm in group 1 and 20.35 S.D. 8.04 mm in group 2; results that are statistically significant different from the control group (p<0.001). Mean posterior elevation was 126.23 S.D. 57.7 mm in group 1 and 54.28 S.D. 19.55 mm in group 2, both showing a statistically significant difference from the control group (p<0.001). Minimal corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth also showed statistically significant differences between the three groups. No differences were found in corneal diameter values.
CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant differences were found in anterior and posterior elevation, minimal corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth parameters, as measured by the Orbscan system, between normal myopic subjects and those with clinical and sub-clinical keratoconus. These parameters should be considered in the detection of patients with increased risk for developing secondary keratectasia following corneal refractive surgery.