m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Oral radiology · 2025

Impact of apical foramen diameter on periapical lesion volume and sphericity: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study.

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Souza Ariane Moreira Fernandez, Alves Dos Santos Guilherme Nilson, Assis Helena Cristina, Rosa-E-Silva Vinicius Leite, Cardoso Gustavo Santos, Cruz-Filho Antonio Miranda, Sousa-Neto Manoel Damião, Lopes-Olhê Fabiane Carneiro, Gaêta-Araújo Hugo, Mazzi-Chaves Jardel Francisco

Аннотация

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the anatomical characteristics of periapical lesions in untreated teeth by correlating lesion diameter, volume, surface area, and sphericity with the root canal diameter measured 1 mm short of the apical foramen. Additionally, the study compared lesion classifications according to the cone-beam computed tomographic periapical index (CBCTPAI) and the cone-beam computed tomographic periapical volume index (CBCTPAVI) across different anatomical regions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 500 CBCT scans were assessed to identify periapical radiolucencies in teeth without previous endodontic treatment. Lesions were classified using CBCTPAI based on maximum diameter and CBCTPAVI based on volume. The apical canal diameter was measured 1 mm from the apex in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. Lesion volume and surface area were segmented semi-automatically, and sphericity was calculated. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman's correlation tests (α = 0.05).

RESULTS: Smaller apical diameters were associated with periapical lesions of smaller diameter and higher sphericity, particularly in mandibular anterior teeth. CBCTPAI scores of 4 were more prevalent in the anterior and posterior maxillary regions and posterior mandibular region. CBCTPAVI score 6 predominated across all regions. Lesions causing cortical bone expansion exhibited significantly larger apical diameters (p = 0.028). No significant differences in root canal diameter were observed across sphericity categories. Overall, the anatomical region influenced the correlation between root canal diameter and lesion characteristics.

CONCLUSION: Periapical lesions varied in size, volume, and morphology according to anatomical region and apical canal diameter. The findings highlight the relevance of CBCT-based volumetric and morphometric assessments to support individualized diagnosis and treatment planning. However, the clinical applicability of lesion volume and sphericity measurements warrants further investigation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Accurate CBCT assessment of periapical lesion dimensions and morphology, combined with measurement of apical canal diameter, can improve treatment planning and prognostic evaluation in endodontics, particularly in cases requiring surgical intervention.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты