Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2001
Precision of three topography instruments in keratoconus subjects.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McMahon T T, Anderson R J, Joslin C E, Rosas G A, Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study Topography Analysis Group
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the test-retest reliability of three popular and commercially available Placido-ring videokeratography instruments in subjects with keratoconus.
METHODS: Nine subjects (16 eyes) with keratoconus of varying degrees of severity had up to four images per eye generated, in random order, from the EyeSys Model II, Dicon CT 200 and the Keratron Corneal Analyzer. Test-retest analyses for the images were sampled at four locations: 1.5 mm nasal, inferior, temporal, and superior from center. The average standard deviation of all points was used to determine the short-term variability of the measurements.
RESULTS: The short-term variability (in diopters) of the Dicon, EyeSys, and Keratron was 0.61 to 3.31 D, 0.94 to 1.51 D, and 0.58 to 2.85 D, respectively, for axial distance maps and 1.07 to 6.82 D, 0.79 to 1.77 D, and 1.23 to 3.03 D for tangential curvature maps.
CONCLUSION: Results support the notion of a loss in repeatability for all three instruments when corneal irregularity is present, which reduces test-retest reliability.
METHODS: Nine subjects (16 eyes) with keratoconus of varying degrees of severity had up to four images per eye generated, in random order, from the EyeSys Model II, Dicon CT 200 and the Keratron Corneal Analyzer. Test-retest analyses for the images were sampled at four locations: 1.5 mm nasal, inferior, temporal, and superior from center. The average standard deviation of all points was used to determine the short-term variability of the measurements.
RESULTS: The short-term variability (in diopters) of the Dicon, EyeSys, and Keratron was 0.61 to 3.31 D, 0.94 to 1.51 D, and 0.58 to 2.85 D, respectively, for axial distance maps and 1.07 to 6.82 D, 0.79 to 1.77 D, and 1.23 to 3.03 D for tangential curvature maps.
CONCLUSION: Results support the notion of a loss in repeatability for all three instruments when corneal irregularity is present, which reduces test-retest reliability.