AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 1997
A comparison of whole-body turboSTIR MR imaging and planar 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eustace S, Tello R, DeCarvalho V, Carey J, Wroblicka J T, Melhem E R, Yucel E K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare whole-body turbo short inversion time inversion recovery MR imaging and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate planar scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with known or suspected skeletal metastatic disease underwent both whole-body turbo short inversion time inversion recovery MR imaging and whole-body 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy.
RESULTS: MR imaging revealed metastases at 57 of 175 possible sites (sensitivity, 96.5%, specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%). Scintigraphy revealed metastases at 43 of 175 possible sites (sensitivity, 72%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 95%) (McNemar test, 0.01; p = .016). Discrepancies in skeletal evaluation by whole-body MR imaging and scintigraphy were observed in six (24%) of 25 patients. Soft-tissue abnormalities were identified in 13 (52%) of 25 patients with MR imaging alone.
CONCLUSION: Preliminary results suggest that whole-body MR imaging is an effective method of examining patients with suspected skeletal metastases, with better sensitivity than conventional planar 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with known or suspected skeletal metastatic disease underwent both whole-body turbo short inversion time inversion recovery MR imaging and whole-body 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy.
RESULTS: MR imaging revealed metastases at 57 of 175 possible sites (sensitivity, 96.5%, specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%). Scintigraphy revealed metastases at 43 of 175 possible sites (sensitivity, 72%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 95%) (McNemar test, 0.01; p = .016). Discrepancies in skeletal evaluation by whole-body MR imaging and scintigraphy were observed in six (24%) of 25 patients. Soft-tissue abnormalities were identified in 13 (52%) of 25 patients with MR imaging alone.
CONCLUSION: Preliminary results suggest that whole-body MR imaging is an effective method of examining patients with suspected skeletal metastases, with better sensitivity than conventional planar 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy.