The Keio journal of medicine · 2008
Correlations of anatomical parameters in dynamic pelvic CT and conventional defecography for patients with rectal prolapse.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Okamoto Norihiro
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlations of anatomical parameters between dynamic pelvic CT (D-PCT) and conventional defecography (CD) for patients with rectal prolapse.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anatomical parameters in multislice CT scanning of the pelvis performed at rest and during simulated defecation (D-PCT) were studied with those of CD to evaluate the correlations in both methods for 10 patients with rectal prolapse.
RESULT: The correlation coefficients of the pubococcygeal line and the pubosacral line were r=0.6 and r=0.8 respectively. The length from anal verge to pubococcygeal line and to the pubosacral line showed a good correlation of r=0.7. The length of puborectal muscle showed a good correlation of r=0.8. Anorectal angle was significantly well correlated between two methods (r=0.9, p<0.05). The lengths of anococcygeal length and anosacral length showed a good correlation.
CONCLUSION: The anatomical parameters measured by D-PCT were well correlated with those by CD. D-PCT might be an alternative tool for anatomical evaluation of the anorectal region in patients with rectal prolapse.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anatomical parameters in multislice CT scanning of the pelvis performed at rest and during simulated defecation (D-PCT) were studied with those of CD to evaluate the correlations in both methods for 10 patients with rectal prolapse.
RESULT: The correlation coefficients of the pubococcygeal line and the pubosacral line were r=0.6 and r=0.8 respectively. The length from anal verge to pubococcygeal line and to the pubosacral line showed a good correlation of r=0.7. The length of puborectal muscle showed a good correlation of r=0.8. Anorectal angle was significantly well correlated between two methods (r=0.9, p<0.05). The lengths of anococcygeal length and anosacral length showed a good correlation.
CONCLUSION: The anatomical parameters measured by D-PCT were well correlated with those by CD. D-PCT might be an alternative tool for anatomical evaluation of the anorectal region in patients with rectal prolapse.