Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2024
Premature ventricular complexes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Accounting for regression to the mean.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Choy Alex, Stanton Eric, Gegechkori Nana, Gibson Kyle, Strzeciwilk Magdalena, Lam Jeff, Hsia Brian, Dukkipati Srinivas, Reddy Vivek Y, Whang William
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have indicated that the frequency of premature ventricular complexes (PVC) increases after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, these studies have primarily focused on patients whose PVC burden increased rather than including the full spectrum of outcomes.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent first-time AF ablation from 1/2018 to 12/2022 for paroxysmal or persistent AF and had both preablation and postablation rhythm monitoring within 6 months of the procedure. Patients were excluded if they had prior AF or PVC ablation or were prescribed a class I or III antiarrhythmic medication. Among 2945 patients who underwent AF ablation during the study period, 130 patients underwent first-time AF ablation and received both pre and post ambulatory monitoring. The median PVC burden before ablation was <1%. Most patients (63%) had no change in PVC burden after AF ablation compared with preablation, and patients who had an increase in PVC burden were offset by those with reductions in PVCs. A paired analysis pre- and post-AF ablation showed no significant change in PVC burden (p = .495).
CONCLUSION: Although an elevated PVC burden after AF ablation may be seen clinically, the majority of patients have no change in burden. Studies that suggest an increase in PVC burden after AF ablation may suffer from incomplete sample selection and thus omit the important effect of regression to the mean.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent first-time AF ablation from 1/2018 to 12/2022 for paroxysmal or persistent AF and had both preablation and postablation rhythm monitoring within 6 months of the procedure. Patients were excluded if they had prior AF or PVC ablation or were prescribed a class I or III antiarrhythmic medication. Among 2945 patients who underwent AF ablation during the study period, 130 patients underwent first-time AF ablation and received both pre and post ambulatory monitoring. The median PVC burden before ablation was <1%. Most patients (63%) had no change in PVC burden after AF ablation compared with preablation, and patients who had an increase in PVC burden were offset by those with reductions in PVCs. A paired analysis pre- and post-AF ablation showed no significant change in PVC burden (p = .495).
CONCLUSION: Although an elevated PVC burden after AF ablation may be seen clinically, the majority of patients have no change in burden. Studies that suggest an increase in PVC burden after AF ablation may suffer from incomplete sample selection and thus omit the important effect of regression to the mean.