Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2023
Validation of a Parkinson's disease questionnaire-39-based functional mobility composite score (FMCS) in people with Parkinson's disease.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hanff Anne-Marie, McCrum Christopher, Rauschenberger Armin, Aguayo Gloria A, Zeegers Maurice P, Leist Anja K, Krüger Rejko, NCER-PD
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Functional mobility is an important outcome for people with Parkinson's disease (PwP). Despite this, there is no established patient-reported outcome measure that serves as a gold standard for assessing patient-reported functional mobility in PwP. We aimed to validate the algorithm calculating the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) based Functional Mobility Composite Score (FMCS).
METHODS: We designed a count-based algorithm to measure patient-reported functional mobility in PwP from items of the PDQ-39 subscales mobility and activities of daily living. Convergent validity of the algorithm calculating the PDQ-39-based FMCS was assessed using the objective Timed Up and Go (n = 253) and discriminative validity was assessed by comparing the FMCS with patient-reported (MDS-UPDRS II) and clinician-assessed (MDS-UPDRS III) motor symptoms as well as between disease stages (H&Y) and PIGD phenotypes (n = 736). Participants were between 22 and 92 years old, with a disease duration from 0 to 32 years and 64.9% in a H&Y 1-2 ranging from 1 to 5.
RESULTS: Spearman correlation coefficients (rs) ranging from -0.45 to -0.77 (p < 0.001) indicated convergent validity. Hence, a t-test suggested sufficient ability of the FMCS to discriminate (p < 0.001) between patient-reported and clinician-assessed motor symptoms. More specifically, FMCS was more strongly associated with patient-reported MDS-UPDRS II (rs = -0.77) than clinician-reported MDS-UPDRS III (rs = -0.45) and can discriminate between disease stages as between PIGD phenotypes (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The FMCS is a valid composite score to assess functional mobility through patient reports in PwP for studying functional mobility in studies using the PDQ-39.
METHODS: We designed a count-based algorithm to measure patient-reported functional mobility in PwP from items of the PDQ-39 subscales mobility and activities of daily living. Convergent validity of the algorithm calculating the PDQ-39-based FMCS was assessed using the objective Timed Up and Go (n = 253) and discriminative validity was assessed by comparing the FMCS with patient-reported (MDS-UPDRS II) and clinician-assessed (MDS-UPDRS III) motor symptoms as well as between disease stages (H&Y) and PIGD phenotypes (n = 736). Participants were between 22 and 92 years old, with a disease duration from 0 to 32 years and 64.9% in a H&Y 1-2 ranging from 1 to 5.
RESULTS: Spearman correlation coefficients (rs) ranging from -0.45 to -0.77 (p < 0.001) indicated convergent validity. Hence, a t-test suggested sufficient ability of the FMCS to discriminate (p < 0.001) between patient-reported and clinician-assessed motor symptoms. More specifically, FMCS was more strongly associated with patient-reported MDS-UPDRS II (rs = -0.77) than clinician-reported MDS-UPDRS III (rs = -0.45) and can discriminate between disease stages as between PIGD phenotypes (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The FMCS is a valid composite score to assess functional mobility through patient reports in PwP for studying functional mobility in studies using the PDQ-39.