MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001950

Медицинская библиотека · Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology · 2024

[The perception gap on migraine: a survey study of the migraine patients, family members, and physicians].

Suzuki Shiho, Shibata Mamoru, Danno Daisuke, Tanizawa Yoshinori, Osaga Satoshi, Hamakawa Masayuki, Komori Mika

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Migraine is a disease that is difficult to be recognized by those around the patients, even though it causes significant hindrances. In this study, we conducted an exploratory comparison of the perceptions on migraine among patients, family members living with them, and physicians treating migraine patients. Patients and family members shared a common understanding on the pain of migraine, and hoped to spend more/better time together as a family. However, although family members felt compassion for the patients, lack of understanding by and patients' concern for the surroundings led to feelings of resignation and endurance on the side of patients. Regarding physicians' medical care, our results suggested the importance to understand the wishes and obstacles of each patient and to propose treatment accordingly. In order to reduce the burden of migraine, it is necessary to create an environment and raise awareness that allows people around the patients to understand and support the pain and hopes that each patient feels.

Для цитирования: Suzuki Shiho, Shibata Mamoru, Danno Daisuke, Tanizawa Yoshinori, Osaga Satoshi, Hamakawa Masayuki, Komori Mika. [The perception gap on migraine: a survey study of the migraine patients, family members, and physicians].. Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology. 2024. DOI: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001950.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.