Surgical oncology · 2015
Lymphatic ascites after retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Perez-Medina Tirso, Pereira Augusto, San-Frutos Luis, García-Espantaleón Manuel, Chiverto Yoana, Engels Virginia, Ronchas Marina, Troyano Juan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The incidence, diagnosis, treatment and outcome of lymphatic ascites (LA) are studied on 85 consecutive patients with gynecologic cancer who had undergone pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy by means of laparotomy or laparoscopy.
METHODS: Patients were distributed in two groups depending in the access: Laparoscopy (study group: 44 patients) and laparotomy (control group: 41 patients). All surgical parameters were collected and patients underwent ultrasound examination on postoperative days 7, 14, and 28. The main outcome measure was the development of symptomatic or asymptomatic LA.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
RESULTS: LA developed in 3 patients (6.8%) in the study group and 9 in the control group (22%), with statistical difference (p < 0.05). The relative risk to develop lymphatic ascites after surgery performed by laparotomy was 3.2 (95% CI 1.05-11.07). Mean nodes harvested during the surgery was 18.6 (SD 6.6) in the LA group and 20.4 (SD 9.1) in the group with no LA (p = 0.527).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of LA after retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer patients is lower in the patients treated by laparoscopy.
METHODS: Patients were distributed in two groups depending in the access: Laparoscopy (study group: 44 patients) and laparotomy (control group: 41 patients). All surgical parameters were collected and patients underwent ultrasound examination on postoperative days 7, 14, and 28. The main outcome measure was the development of symptomatic or asymptomatic LA.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
RESULTS: LA developed in 3 patients (6.8%) in the study group and 9 in the control group (22%), with statistical difference (p < 0.05). The relative risk to develop lymphatic ascites after surgery performed by laparotomy was 3.2 (95% CI 1.05-11.07). Mean nodes harvested during the surgery was 18.6 (SD 6.6) in the LA group and 20.4 (SD 9.1) in the group with no LA (p = 0.527).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of LA after retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer patients is lower in the patients treated by laparoscopy.