The Knee · 2015
A new technique using mesh for extensor reconstruction after proximal tibial resection.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ichikawa Jiro, Matsumoto Seiichi, Shimoji Takashi, Ae Keisuke, Tanizawa Taisuke, Gokita Tabu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Proximal tibial reconstruction following wide resection in both malignant and benign tumors presents difficulties mainly due to both patellar tendon reconstruction and high risk of infection. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of a new technique using a mesh for extensor reconstruction.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed nine consecutive patients who underwent resection of the proximal tibia with prosthetic reconstruction and reconstruction of the extensor using a mesh between 2009 and 2012. The surgical technique included the attachment of the mesh to the tibial component with a band of meshes looped over the patella and a gastrocnemius flap for coverage.
RESULTS: One patient had an above-the-knee amputation due to infection. Eight patients were followed up for 33 months (range, 20-50). In the eight patients, extensor lag had a mean of 5° (range, 0 to 20). Active flexion had a mean of 96.25° (range, 80 to 120) and ISOLS scores had a mean of 21/30 (range, 18 to 26). All patients were able to ambulate without crutches at the latest follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Extensor lag was significantly less compared to previous reports. No complications were observed in eight patients. Utilization of the mesh for extensor reconstruction after the proximal tibial resection is a simple, reliable and successful method.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed nine consecutive patients who underwent resection of the proximal tibia with prosthetic reconstruction and reconstruction of the extensor using a mesh between 2009 and 2012. The surgical technique included the attachment of the mesh to the tibial component with a band of meshes looped over the patella and a gastrocnemius flap for coverage.
RESULTS: One patient had an above-the-knee amputation due to infection. Eight patients were followed up for 33 months (range, 20-50). In the eight patients, extensor lag had a mean of 5° (range, 0 to 20). Active flexion had a mean of 96.25° (range, 80 to 120) and ISOLS scores had a mean of 21/30 (range, 18 to 26). All patients were able to ambulate without crutches at the latest follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Extensor lag was significantly less compared to previous reports. No complications were observed in eight patients. Utilization of the mesh for extensor reconstruction after the proximal tibial resection is a simple, reliable and successful method.