Neuro-oncology advances · 2024
Automated pediatric brain tumor imaging assessment tool from CBTN: Enhancing suprasellar region inclusion and managing limited data with deep learning.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gandhi Deep B, Khalili Nastaran, Familiar Ariana M, Gottipati Anurag, Khalili Neda, Tu Wenxin, Haldar Shuvanjan, Anderson Hannah, Viswanathan Karthik, Storm Phillip B, Ware Jeffrey B, Resnick Adam, Vossough Arastoo, Nabavizadeh Ali, Fathi Kazerooni Anahita
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Fully automatic skull-stripping and tumor segmentation are crucial for monitoring pediatric brain tumors (PBT). Current methods, however, often lack generalizability, particularly for rare tumors in the sellar/suprasellar regions and when applied to real-world clinical data in limited data scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose AI-driven techniques for skull-stripping and tumor segmentation.
METHODS: Multi-institutional, multi-parametric MRI scans from 527 pediatric patients (n = 336 for skull-stripping, n = 489 for tumor segmentation) with various PBT histologies were processed to train separate nnU-Net-based deep learning models for skull-stripping, whole tumor (WT), and enhancing tumor (ET) segmentation. These models utilized single (T2/FLAIR) or multiple (T1-Gd and T2/FLAIR) input imaging sequences. Performance was evaluated using Dice scores, sensitivity, and 95% Hausdorff distances. Statistical comparisons included paired or unpaired 2-sample t-tests and Pearson's correlation coefficient based on Dice scores from different models and PBT histologies.
RESULTS: Dice scores for the skull-stripping models for whole brain and sellar/suprasellar region segmentation were 0.98 ± 0.01 (median 0.98) for both multi- and single-parametric models, with significant Pearson's correlation coefficient between single- and multi-parametric Dice scores (r > 0.80; P < .05 for all). Whole tumor Dice scores for single-input tumor segmentation models were 0.84 ± 0.17 (median = 0.90) for T2 and 0.82 ± 0.19 (median = 0.89) for FLAIR inputs. Enhancing tumor Dice scores were 0.65 ± 0.35 (median = 0.79) for T1-Gd+FLAIR and 0.64 ± 0.36 (median = 0.79) for T1-Gd+T2 inputs.
CONCLUSION: Our skull-stripping models demonstrate excellent performance and include sellar/suprasellar regions, using single- or multi-parametric inputs. Additionally, our automated tumor segmentation models can reliably delineate whole lesions and ET regions, adapting to MRI sessions with missing sequences in limited data context.
METHODS: Multi-institutional, multi-parametric MRI scans from 527 pediatric patients (n = 336 for skull-stripping, n = 489 for tumor segmentation) with various PBT histologies were processed to train separate nnU-Net-based deep learning models for skull-stripping, whole tumor (WT), and enhancing tumor (ET) segmentation. These models utilized single (T2/FLAIR) or multiple (T1-Gd and T2/FLAIR) input imaging sequences. Performance was evaluated using Dice scores, sensitivity, and 95% Hausdorff distances. Statistical comparisons included paired or unpaired 2-sample t-tests and Pearson's correlation coefficient based on Dice scores from different models and PBT histologies.
RESULTS: Dice scores for the skull-stripping models for whole brain and sellar/suprasellar region segmentation were 0.98 ± 0.01 (median 0.98) for both multi- and single-parametric models, with significant Pearson's correlation coefficient between single- and multi-parametric Dice scores (r > 0.80; P < .05 for all). Whole tumor Dice scores for single-input tumor segmentation models were 0.84 ± 0.17 (median = 0.90) for T2 and 0.82 ± 0.19 (median = 0.89) for FLAIR inputs. Enhancing tumor Dice scores were 0.65 ± 0.35 (median = 0.79) for T1-Gd+FLAIR and 0.64 ± 0.36 (median = 0.79) for T1-Gd+T2 inputs.
CONCLUSION: Our skull-stripping models demonstrate excellent performance and include sellar/suprasellar regions, using single- or multi-parametric inputs. Additionally, our automated tumor segmentation models can reliably delineate whole lesions and ET regions, adapting to MRI sessions with missing sequences in limited data context.