Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015
Recurrence rates after EMR of large sessile serrated polyps.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rex Kevin D, Vemulapalli Krishna C, Rex Douglas K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the recurrence rate after EMR of large (≥20 mm) sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps).
OBJECTIVE: To compare the recurrence rate among SSA/Ps and conventional adenomas in patients referred to a specialty practice for EMR.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic hospital and a satellite surgery center.
PATIENTS: A total of 362 consecutive patients referred for resection of large (≥20 mm) polyps in the colorectum.
INTERVENTIONS: All EMRs were performed with a submucosal contrast agent. All subjects had a follow-up surveillance examination (inspection and biopsy of the EMR) at our center.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of residual polyp at follow-up examination.
RESULTS: Residual polyp was identified among 8.7% of SSA/Ps compared with 11.1% for conventional adenomas (P = .8).
LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, procedures performed by a single experienced endoscopist, low number of serrated lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of recurrence after EMR of SSA/Ps is similar to the rate after EMR of conventional adenomas.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the recurrence rate among SSA/Ps and conventional adenomas in patients referred to a specialty practice for EMR.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic hospital and a satellite surgery center.
PATIENTS: A total of 362 consecutive patients referred for resection of large (≥20 mm) polyps in the colorectum.
INTERVENTIONS: All EMRs were performed with a submucosal contrast agent. All subjects had a follow-up surveillance examination (inspection and biopsy of the EMR) at our center.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of residual polyp at follow-up examination.
RESULTS: Residual polyp was identified among 8.7% of SSA/Ps compared with 11.1% for conventional adenomas (P = .8).
LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, procedures performed by a single experienced endoscopist, low number of serrated lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of recurrence after EMR of SSA/Ps is similar to the rate after EMR of conventional adenomas.