MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.07.012

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of ophthalmology · 2009

Economic appraisal of the Boston Ocular Surface Prosthesis.

Shepard Donald S, Razavi Moaven, Stason William B, Jacobs Deborah S, Suaya Jose A, Cohen Mark, Rosenthal Perry

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To perform an economic appraisal of the Boston Ocular Surface Prosthesis in patients with corneal ectasia, irregular astigmatism, or ocular surface disease.

DESIGN

Cost, incremental cost-effectiveness, and benefit-cost analyses in a prospective observational study.

METHODS

The effects of this scleral lens on visual functioning were measured in 69 patients who received the prosthesis in 2006 and were reassessed 6 months after fitting the prosthesis. Benefits, based on improvements in visual functioning, were converted to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and economic values were derived using results from published studies. Costs were estimated from the provider organization's 2006 operating financial statement with additions for donated resources and future scale-up.

RESULTS

Mean scores on a 100-point visual functioning questionnaire (VFQ-25) improved from 57.0 to 77.8 (P < .0001). On average, each fitted patient cost $11,841 ($6001 for clinical services and $5840 to produce the prosthesis). Patients' quality of life improved by 0.10 QALYs per year. Assuming that benefits persist for an average of 5 years, the lifetime gain was 0.48 QALYs; the average cost-effectiveness of the prosthesis was $24,900 per QALY (95% confidence interval $19,100 to $29,600), and the average benefit-cost ratio was 4.0 to 1. In patients with the lowest baseline scores (average VFQ score 38.6), results were even more favorable: cost-effectiveness $17,100 per QALY and benefit-cost ratio 5.6 to 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The Boston Ocular Surface Prosthesis is cost-effective and cost beneficial in patients with severely compromised visual function attributable to ectasia, irregular astigmatism, or ocular surface disease.

Для цитирования: Shepard Donald S, Razavi Moaven, Stason William B, Jacobs Deborah S, Suaya Jose A, Cohen Mark, Rosenthal Perry. Economic appraisal of the Boston Ocular Surface Prosthesis.. American journal of ophthalmology. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.07.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.