Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
Evaluation of stress myocardial blood flow patterns in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Calabretta Raffaella, Kokomani Aurora, Fumagalli Carlo, Olivotto Iacopo, Camici Paolo G, Hacker Marcus, Sciagrà Roberto
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Among the other variants, the apical pattern of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (AHCM) is probably the most important, with possible aneurysmatic evolution.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 12 patients with AHCM who underwent [13N]NH3-PET/CT. Regional perfusion, stress global myocardial blood flow (MBF), and transmural perfusion patterns were assessed. To evaluate the LV-MBF distribution, we compared the apex with septum and infero-lateral wall. Furthermore, global stress MBF distribution in AHCM patients was compared with a reference septal HCM cohort. Visual regional perfusion analysis demonstrated an apical hypoperfusion in 10 of 12 patients, without correlation with the stress MBF of the whole LV. Significant differences among stress MBF in apical, in septal, and in the infero-lateral walls were recorded (P < .02). The transmural analysis showed a significant difference among the three segment groups for epicardial (P < .003) as well for endocardial MBF (P < .005). In the post hoc analysis, the apical MBF was significantly lower than in septal and infero-lateral walls in epicardium (P < .005) and significantly lower than the infero-lateral MBF in endocardium (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: In patients with AHCM, more severe apical microvascular impairment was found as compared to patients with classical septal HCM, supporting the suspicion that ischemia could play a role in the future aneurysmatic evolution of AHCM.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 12 patients with AHCM who underwent [13N]NH3-PET/CT. Regional perfusion, stress global myocardial blood flow (MBF), and transmural perfusion patterns were assessed. To evaluate the LV-MBF distribution, we compared the apex with septum and infero-lateral wall. Furthermore, global stress MBF distribution in AHCM patients was compared with a reference septal HCM cohort. Visual regional perfusion analysis demonstrated an apical hypoperfusion in 10 of 12 patients, without correlation with the stress MBF of the whole LV. Significant differences among stress MBF in apical, in septal, and in the infero-lateral walls were recorded (P < .02). The transmural analysis showed a significant difference among the three segment groups for epicardial (P < .003) as well for endocardial MBF (P < .005). In the post hoc analysis, the apical MBF was significantly lower than in septal and infero-lateral walls in epicardium (P < .005) and significantly lower than the infero-lateral MBF in endocardium (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: In patients with AHCM, more severe apical microvascular impairment was found as compared to patients with classical septal HCM, supporting the suspicion that ischemia could play a role in the future aneurysmatic evolution of AHCM.