Nurse educator · 2026
Student Evaluation of Courses in Health Care Professions: A Scoping Review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murphy Jessica D, Peterson Jennifer K, Montejo Leigh, Wright Rebecca, Monk Jermaine J, Zhang Jie, King Goode Colleen, Slater Tammy, Mudd Shawna S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In higher education, student evaluations of courses (SECs) inform the achievement of learning outcomes, accreditation requirements, curricular improvement, and teaching quality, yet research focused on health care education is limited.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the literature on SECs in academic health care education and identify themes and best practices.
METHODS: Databases were searched from 2015 to 2026. Exclusion criteria included continuing education, program evaluations, reviews, commentaries, non-peer-reviewed publications, and non-English manuscripts.
RESULTS: Analysis of 44 studies revealed 5 themes: (1) processes/methods for course evaluations, (2) improving the effectiveness of course evaluations, (3) improving response rates, (4) student and faculty perspectives on course evaluations, and (5) bias in course evaluations.
CONCLUSION: SECs in health care education are multifaceted. Best practices include using validated instruments, diverse feedback methods, and response-rate strategies, and addressing bias. Future research should focus on standardization and the effects of evaluation-driven changes on educational outcomes.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the literature on SECs in academic health care education and identify themes and best practices.
METHODS: Databases were searched from 2015 to 2026. Exclusion criteria included continuing education, program evaluations, reviews, commentaries, non-peer-reviewed publications, and non-English manuscripts.
RESULTS: Analysis of 44 studies revealed 5 themes: (1) processes/methods for course evaluations, (2) improving the effectiveness of course evaluations, (3) improving response rates, (4) student and faculty perspectives on course evaluations, and (5) bias in course evaluations.
CONCLUSION: SECs in health care education are multifaceted. Best practices include using validated instruments, diverse feedback methods, and response-rate strategies, and addressing bias. Future research should focus on standardization and the effects of evaluation-driven changes on educational outcomes.