Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2000
[Long-term outcome after coronary emergency intervention].
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Frantz E, Hug J, Pfautsch P, Baumann M, Fleck E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Coronary angioplasty (CAG) has become an acceptable method of treating an acute coronary syndrome (myocardial infarction [MI] or unstable angina [UA]). It was the aim of this study to determine whether the results of such emergency treatment differed from those after elective CAG.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Results of emergency CAG in 581 patients (aged 60 +/- 11 years; 77% males) admitted to the authors' hospital between July 1994 and December 1996 were compared with those of elective CAG in 2,460 patients (aged 61 +/- 10, admitted during the same period. Follow-up information was obtained after 22.4 +/- 11 months in 93.2% of the patients by examination, written answers to annual questionnaires, data being collected on survival, repeat cardia catheterizations, other interventions, aorto-coronary bypass, occurrence of myocardial infarction, the patients' general state and drugs received.
RESULTS: 19 of 517 patients (3.7%) of the group who had undergone elective CAG had died during the follow-up period, compared with 107 of 2436 of the emergency cohort (4.4%; not significant). There were also no significant differences regarding repeat cardiac catheterization, interventions, coronary bypass or re-admission. The proportion of subsequent emergency CAG among all CAGs was 16.8% in the emergency cohort, 8.8% after elective angiography (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Coronary angiography performed in patients with an acute coronary syndrome has no prognostic significance regarding mortality and morbidity after the acute phase of the disease.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Results of emergency CAG in 581 patients (aged 60 +/- 11 years; 77% males) admitted to the authors' hospital between July 1994 and December 1996 were compared with those of elective CAG in 2,460 patients (aged 61 +/- 10, admitted during the same period. Follow-up information was obtained after 22.4 +/- 11 months in 93.2% of the patients by examination, written answers to annual questionnaires, data being collected on survival, repeat cardia catheterizations, other interventions, aorto-coronary bypass, occurrence of myocardial infarction, the patients' general state and drugs received.
RESULTS: 19 of 517 patients (3.7%) of the group who had undergone elective CAG had died during the follow-up period, compared with 107 of 2436 of the emergency cohort (4.4%; not significant). There were also no significant differences regarding repeat cardiac catheterization, interventions, coronary bypass or re-admission. The proportion of subsequent emergency CAG among all CAGs was 16.8% in the emergency cohort, 8.8% after elective angiography (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Coronary angiography performed in patients with an acute coronary syndrome has no prognostic significance regarding mortality and morbidity after the acute phase of the disease.