MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jce.14088

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2019

Misdiagnosis of ARVC leading to inappropriate ICD implant and subsequent ICD removal - lessons learned.

Sharma Apurva, Assis Fabrizio, James Cynthia A, Murray Brittney, Tichnell Crystal, Tandri Harikrishna, Calkins Hugh

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited progressive cardiomyopathy characterized by frequent life-threatening arrhythmias. The diagnosis of ARVC is challenging and is on the basis of a set of major and minor criteria as described by the modified Task Force Criteria (TFC). We report our clinical experience in a series of patients who were misdiagnosed with ARVC and subsequently underwent removal of their implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) after a re-evaluation at our center.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

We studied 12 patients who were misdiagnosed with ARVC and had ICD implantation before our assessment. All patients had a repeat evaluation and were scored according to TFC before ICD removal. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) studies performed at outside institutions during the initial evaluation were reported abnormal and classified as meeting major TFC in ninety percent of patients. The most common abnormality reported was fatty infiltration of the right ventricular (RV) free wall and/or presence of focal intra-myocardial fat in six patients (50%). On re-evaluation, none of these findings fulfilled the TFC for the diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that high dependence on misinterpretation of CMR along with a misunderstanding of the TFC evaluation are the main reasons for the misdiagnosis of ARVC. Despite the updated criteria for almost a decade, this study reminds that the diagnosis of ARVC is complex and hence careful TFC evaluation and consideration of multiple cardiac test results should be the focused approach for clinicians when confronted with suspected ARVC patients.

Для цитирования: Sharma Apurva, Assis Fabrizio, James Cynthia A, Murray Brittney, Tichnell Crystal, Tandri Harikrishna, Calkins Hugh. Misdiagnosis of ARVC leading to inappropriate ICD implant and subsequent ICD removal - lessons learned.. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2019. DOI: 10.1111/jce.14088.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.