General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020
18F-FDG-PET/CT predicts grade of malignancy and invasive potential of thymic epithelial tumors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ito Takamasa, Suzuki Hidemi, Sakairi Yuichi, Wada Hironobu, Nakajima Takahiro, Yoshino Ichiro
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography coupled with computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) to predict the WHO malignancy grade, initial staging, and invasive potential of thymic epithelial tumors.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 56 patients with thymic epithelial tumors who were evaluated by PET/CT before surgery and underwent surgical resection. We analyzed the relationship of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) with the WHO histological classification, tumor invasion, TNM classification, and the Masaoka-Koga classification.
RESULTS: There were differences of SUVmax of the FDG-PET between thymic carcinoma (9.09 ± 3.34) and thymoma (4.86 ± 2.45; p < 0.01), thymic carcinoma (9.09 ± 3.34) and high-grade thymoma (6.01 ± 2.78; p < 0.01), and high-grade thymoma (6.01 ± 2.78) and low-grade thymoma (4.06 ± 1.86; p < 0.01). The cut-off value for the SUVmax was 7.40 and 5.40, and the sensitivity/specificity for predicting the histologic subtype of each group was 0.72/0.79 and 0.61/0.85, respectively. According to T classification, SUVmax was significantly higher in T3 (8.31 ± 2.57) than in T1a (4.45 ± 2.06; p < 0.01). Regarding Masaoka-Koga classification and WHO histological classification, a significantly higher SUVmax was detected in patients with stage III and IV disease than in those with stage I and II diseases (p < 0.01). The cut-off value for SUVmax was 5.40 in Masaoka-Koga stage and 5.60 in the WHO classification; the sensitivity/specificity for predicting the histologic subtype was 0.85/0.80 and 0.89/0.78, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET is a useful tool to predict aggressiveness of thymic epithelial tumors.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 56 patients with thymic epithelial tumors who were evaluated by PET/CT before surgery and underwent surgical resection. We analyzed the relationship of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) with the WHO histological classification, tumor invasion, TNM classification, and the Masaoka-Koga classification.
RESULTS: There were differences of SUVmax of the FDG-PET between thymic carcinoma (9.09 ± 3.34) and thymoma (4.86 ± 2.45; p < 0.01), thymic carcinoma (9.09 ± 3.34) and high-grade thymoma (6.01 ± 2.78; p < 0.01), and high-grade thymoma (6.01 ± 2.78) and low-grade thymoma (4.06 ± 1.86; p < 0.01). The cut-off value for the SUVmax was 7.40 and 5.40, and the sensitivity/specificity for predicting the histologic subtype of each group was 0.72/0.79 and 0.61/0.85, respectively. According to T classification, SUVmax was significantly higher in T3 (8.31 ± 2.57) than in T1a (4.45 ± 2.06; p < 0.01). Regarding Masaoka-Koga classification and WHO histological classification, a significantly higher SUVmax was detected in patients with stage III and IV disease than in those with stage I and II diseases (p < 0.01). The cut-off value for SUVmax was 5.40 in Masaoka-Koga stage and 5.60 in the WHO classification; the sensitivity/specificity for predicting the histologic subtype was 0.85/0.80 and 0.89/0.78, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET is a useful tool to predict aggressiveness of thymic epithelial tumors.