Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery · 2019
Now Anyone Can Kegel: One-Time Office Teaching of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nguyen My-Linh T, Armstrong Abigail A, Wieslander Cecilia K, Tarnay Christopher M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: In women with pelvic floor disorders, we sought to determine time-to-teach (TTT) correct pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction, prevalence of inappropriate muscle contractions, and the association between TTT with PFM strength (PFMS).
METHODS: From August 2017 to April 2018, patients from 2 pelvic floor disorder clinics participated in a prospective study examining PFMS. Assessment of PFMS was performed to obtain TTT, inappropriate accessory muscle, and Modified Oxford Grading Scale scores for pelvic floor muscle contractions 1 to pelvic floor muscle contractions 2.
RESULTS: Of 100 women, 77 were from low-resource setting and 23 from high-resource setting. Mean TTT overall was 64.1 seconds (±26.0; range, 9-160 seconds), and mean TTT between settings was not significant. Mean overall TTT was significantly less than 90 seconds. Seventy-one women (71%) demonstrated at least 1 inappropriate accessory muscle, and of those, up to 50% of patients contracting 2 accessory muscle groups with abdominal muscles most frequently contracted at baseline. Thirty-nine percent of patients had a PFM contraction of at least 3 at baseline compared with 82% of patients upon completion of teaching, with 60% of women with scores of 4 or 5. The mean difference overall between baseline and pelvic floor muscle contractions 3 was 1.27 (confidence interval, 1.08-1.46; P < 0.001), and this increase was significant.
CONCLUSIONS: One-time PFMS teaching can be done in a time-proficient fashion and is translatable across high-resource and low-resource settings. Most patients show improvement in PFMS immediately and can quickly acquire this learned skill for proper home practice.
METHODS: From August 2017 to April 2018, patients from 2 pelvic floor disorder clinics participated in a prospective study examining PFMS. Assessment of PFMS was performed to obtain TTT, inappropriate accessory muscle, and Modified Oxford Grading Scale scores for pelvic floor muscle contractions 1 to pelvic floor muscle contractions 2.
RESULTS: Of 100 women, 77 were from low-resource setting and 23 from high-resource setting. Mean TTT overall was 64.1 seconds (±26.0; range, 9-160 seconds), and mean TTT between settings was not significant. Mean overall TTT was significantly less than 90 seconds. Seventy-one women (71%) demonstrated at least 1 inappropriate accessory muscle, and of those, up to 50% of patients contracting 2 accessory muscle groups with abdominal muscles most frequently contracted at baseline. Thirty-nine percent of patients had a PFM contraction of at least 3 at baseline compared with 82% of patients upon completion of teaching, with 60% of women with scores of 4 or 5. The mean difference overall between baseline and pelvic floor muscle contractions 3 was 1.27 (confidence interval, 1.08-1.46; P < 0.001), and this increase was significant.
CONCLUSIONS: One-time PFMS teaching can be done in a time-proficient fashion and is translatable across high-resource and low-resource settings. Most patients show improvement in PFMS immediately and can quickly acquire this learned skill for proper home practice.