Heart rhythm · 2013
Differential sequential septal pacing: a simple maneuver to differentiate nodal versus extranodal ventriculoatrial conduction.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Derval Nicolas, Skanes Allan C, Gula Lorne J, Gray Chris, Denis Arnaud, Lim Han S, Krahn Andrew D, Yee Raymond, Sacher Frederic, Haïssaguerre Michel, Klein George J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Distinguishing retrograde nodal conduction from extranodal conduction using an accessory pathway (AP) can sometimes be challenging.
OBJECTIVE: To distinguish nodal from extranodal ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction regardless of AP location by proposing a simple method. This method is based on the principle that moving the pacing site progressively from the basal region toward the entrance of the His-Purkinje system should shorten VA time for nodal but not for AP conduction.
METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with supraventricular tachycardia were prospectively recruited. Quadripolar catheters were placed at the right ventricular (RV) apex, right atrium, and His and coronary sinus. The RV septum was sequentially paced at 4 sites: (1) basal, (2) high midventricle, (3) low midventricle, and (4) apex at a cycle length 100 ms shorter than the resting cycle length. The stimulus-to-atrial (SA) interval was measured by using the proximal coronary sinus atrial electrogram.
RESULTS: Group 1 (n = 33) had nodal VA conduction; all patients had typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Group 2 (n = 34) had extranodal VA conduction via an AP: 19 left-sided, 6 right-sided, and 9 posteroseptal. In group 1, the SA interval decreased significantly as pacing site moved closer toward the apex (site 1: 166 ± 35 ms, site 2: 153 ± 32 ms, site 3: 149 ± 32 ms, site 4: 154 ± 33 ms, P < .001, respectively, at sites 2-4 compared with site 1). In contrast, in group 2, the SA interval increased significantly toward the apex (site 1: 149 ± 45 ms, site 2: 158 ± 43 ms, site 3: 161 ± 43 ms, and site 4: 163 ± 40 ms, P < .001, respectively, at sites 2-4 compared with site 1). The SA interval at the high midventricular site (site 2) - SA interval at the base (site 1) ≤ 0 ms for nodal and > 0 ms for extranodal conduction had optimal sensitivity and specificity (nodal: selectivity = 97.0% and specificity = 85.3%; extranodal: selectivity = 85.3% and specificity = 97.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Differential sequential pacing of the RV septum reliably distinguishes retrograde atrioventricular nodal conduction from AP conduction.
OBJECTIVE: To distinguish nodal from extranodal ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction regardless of AP location by proposing a simple method. This method is based on the principle that moving the pacing site progressively from the basal region toward the entrance of the His-Purkinje system should shorten VA time for nodal but not for AP conduction.
METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with supraventricular tachycardia were prospectively recruited. Quadripolar catheters were placed at the right ventricular (RV) apex, right atrium, and His and coronary sinus. The RV septum was sequentially paced at 4 sites: (1) basal, (2) high midventricle, (3) low midventricle, and (4) apex at a cycle length 100 ms shorter than the resting cycle length. The stimulus-to-atrial (SA) interval was measured by using the proximal coronary sinus atrial electrogram.
RESULTS: Group 1 (n = 33) had nodal VA conduction; all patients had typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Group 2 (n = 34) had extranodal VA conduction via an AP: 19 left-sided, 6 right-sided, and 9 posteroseptal. In group 1, the SA interval decreased significantly as pacing site moved closer toward the apex (site 1: 166 ± 35 ms, site 2: 153 ± 32 ms, site 3: 149 ± 32 ms, site 4: 154 ± 33 ms, P < .001, respectively, at sites 2-4 compared with site 1). In contrast, in group 2, the SA interval increased significantly toward the apex (site 1: 149 ± 45 ms, site 2: 158 ± 43 ms, site 3: 161 ± 43 ms, and site 4: 163 ± 40 ms, P < .001, respectively, at sites 2-4 compared with site 1). The SA interval at the high midventricular site (site 2) - SA interval at the base (site 1) ≤ 0 ms for nodal and > 0 ms for extranodal conduction had optimal sensitivity and specificity (nodal: selectivity = 97.0% and specificity = 85.3%; extranodal: selectivity = 85.3% and specificity = 97.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Differential sequential pacing of the RV septum reliably distinguishes retrograde atrioventricular nodal conduction from AP conduction.