Tumori · 2020
PD-L1 expression level in different thymoma stages and thymic carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Hua-Fei, Wu Li-Xin, Li Xiao-Feng, Zhu You-Cai, Pan Wei-Wei, Wang Wen-Xian, Xu Chun-Wei, Huang Jian-Hui, Wu Min-Hua, Du Kai-Qi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The immune checkpoint ligand, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), is expressed in various tumors and associated with response to drugs that target programmed cell death protein 1. Previous studies have estimated the level of PD-L1 expression among different stages of thymoma and thymic carcinoma to evaluate its potential use as a diagnostic factor; however, its varying expression level has been problematic. We conducted this meta-analysis of published literature to evaluate PD-L1 expression in thymomas and thymic carcinomas.
METHODS: We analyzed 12 studies that included 320 patients with type A/AB/B1 thymoma, 225 patients with type B2/B3 thymoma, and 180 patients with thymic carcinoma.
RESULTS: No difference in PD-L1 expression level was found between the B2/B3 vs C groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26, 1.76; p = 0.42). However, the heterogeneity was very high (I2 = 78%), and a significant difference was found between groups A/AB/B1 and B2/B3 (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12, 0.41; p < 0.001), with a relatively low heterogeneity (I2 = 55%).
CONCLUSION: PD-L1 positivity might be a useful factor to differentiate type A/AB/B1 thymoma from type B2/B3 and thymic carcinoma. This result might be valuable for potential anti PD-L1 treatment in thymoma and thymic carcinoma.
METHODS: We analyzed 12 studies that included 320 patients with type A/AB/B1 thymoma, 225 patients with type B2/B3 thymoma, and 180 patients with thymic carcinoma.
RESULTS: No difference in PD-L1 expression level was found between the B2/B3 vs C groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26, 1.76; p = 0.42). However, the heterogeneity was very high (I2 = 78%), and a significant difference was found between groups A/AB/B1 and B2/B3 (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12, 0.41; p < 0.001), with a relatively low heterogeneity (I2 = 55%).
CONCLUSION: PD-L1 positivity might be a useful factor to differentiate type A/AB/B1 thymoma from type B2/B3 and thymic carcinoma. This result might be valuable for potential anti PD-L1 treatment in thymoma and thymic carcinoma.