MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2214/ajr.05.1581

Медицинская библиотека · AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2007

Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography in a community practice: are there differences between specialists and general radiologists?

Leung Jessica W T, Margolin Frederick R, Dee Katherine E, Jacobs Richard P, Denny Susan R, Schrumpf John D

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of general radiologists in interpretation of mammograms with that of breast imaging specialists in a high-volume community hospital-based private practice.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted with data prospectively collected over a 5-year period in a community hospital-based practice in which 106,405 screening and 52,149 diagnostic mammograms were performed. The performance of three radiologists specializing in breast imaging was compared with that of six general radiologists. The following data were extracted and analyzed: recall rate, biopsy recommendation rate, and cancer detection rate. Statistical analysis was performed with a chi-square test and two-tailed calculation of p values.

RESULTS

The recall rates of the specialists and generalists were nearly the same at 6.5% and 6.7%, respectively. The biopsy recommendation rate at recall from screening examinations was nearly the same for generalists and specialists (1.2% and 1.1%, respectively; p = 0.4504). This rate also was similar for diagnostic examinations (8.5% for generalists; 8.4% for specialists; p = 0.4086). The cancer detection rate in the screening setting was slightly higher for specialists than for generalists: 2.5 and 2.0 cancers per 1,000 cases, respectively (p = 0.0614). The cancer detection rate in the diagnostic setting was 24.2% higher among specialists (20.0 cancers per 1,000 cases) compared with generalists (16.1 cancers per 1,000 cases) (p = 0.0177).

CONCLUSION

The only statistically significant difference between generalists and specialists was in cancer detection rate among patients undergoing diagnostic mammography. No statistically significant difference was identified between the two groups in terms of recall rate, biopsy recommendation rate, or percentage of favorable-prognosis cases of cancer detected. There was a trend toward greater cancer detection by specialists in the screening setting.

Для цитирования: Leung Jessica W T, Margolin Frederick R, Dee Katherine E, Jacobs Richard P, Denny Susan R, Schrumpf John D. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography in a community practice: are there differences between specialists and general radiologists?. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2007. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.05.1581.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.