MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4317/jced.54330

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2018

A randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries.

Garcia-Blanco Matias, Gualtieri Ariel-Felix, Puia Sebastian-Ariel

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To compare global surgical pain under nerve block and mandibular infiltration anesthesia techniques, and to evaluate pain during drilling and the distance to the mandibular canal in posterior mandible implant surgeries.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted to compare nerve block (Group A) to mandibular infiltration (Group B) techniques for dental implant placement. Global surgical pain (VAS = visual analogue scale), pain during drilling or implant placement (MPQ = McGill pain questionnaire) and distance to the mandibular canal (Image J) were statically analyzed. Age, gender, anxiety levels, tooth to be replaced, implant size, adjacent teeth and duration of surgery were also analyzed.

RESULTS

172 patients were included and 283 dental implants were analyzed. VAS values were significantly higher in Group B (p<0.05). In Group A, 99% of the surgeries were performed painlessly during drilling and implant placement, but in Group B, 11.6% of implant placements (17 implants) felt pain during these surgical steps. Mean distance to mandibular canal (3.8 mm, range: 0.0 to 7.0) in those 17 implants placed under mandibular infiltration was clinically and statistically similar to the mean distance (3.0 mm, range: 0.0 to 9.0) of 130 implants placed painless (p=0.10). Pain during drilling under mandibular infiltration was significantly associated with the duration of surgery (p<0.05) and to both adjacent teeth being present (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although both techniques are safe and effective for placing implants in the posterior mandible, nerve block provides a more profound analgesia than mandibular infiltration. When placing implants under mandibular infiltration, as getting closer to the canal does not increase the feeling of pain, it is not recommended to use the presence of pain as a preventive resource to avoid inferior alveolar nerve injuries. Key words:Dental implant, mandibular infiltration anesthesia, nerve block, pain, nerve injury.

Для цитирования: Garcia-Blanco Matias, Gualtieri Ariel-Felix, Puia Sebastian-Ariel. A randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries.. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry. 2018. DOI: 10.4317/jced.54330.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.