Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2007
Pain after minimally invasive videoassisted and after minimally invasive open thyroidectomy--results of a prospective outcome study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Del Rio P, Berti M, Sommaruga L, Arcuri M F, Cataldo S, Sianesi M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Substantial modifications in surgical treatment of thyroid disease have changed the postoperative management of thyroidectomized patients. The reduction of postoperative pain permit a short-stay surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have analyzed the patients treated in our Unit from July 2006 to December 2006, with minimally invasive cervicotomy and mini-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. We have registered the postoperative pain applying an evaluation protocol numeric scale. The results were analyzed by t test.
RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients were divided in two groups: group A, minimally invasive cervicotomy (15 male and 46 female patients); group B, mini-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (9 male and 43 female patients). Upon returning to the ward, the pain scale group A vs B was 2.77 +/- 1.16 vs 2.5 +/- 0.762 (p = 0.22) .At 24 h after surgery, the pain scale in group A was 1.82 +/- 1.258 vs 1.031 +/- 0.8608 (p < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are safe, but mini-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy gives not only a better cosmetic result but a reduction of postoperative pain especially at 24 h.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have analyzed the patients treated in our Unit from July 2006 to December 2006, with minimally invasive cervicotomy and mini-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. We have registered the postoperative pain applying an evaluation protocol numeric scale. The results were analyzed by t test.
RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients were divided in two groups: group A, minimally invasive cervicotomy (15 male and 46 female patients); group B, mini-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (9 male and 43 female patients). Upon returning to the ward, the pain scale group A vs B was 2.77 +/- 1.16 vs 2.5 +/- 0.762 (p = 0.22) .At 24 h after surgery, the pain scale in group A was 1.82 +/- 1.258 vs 1.031 +/- 0.8608 (p < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are safe, but mini-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy gives not only a better cosmetic result but a reduction of postoperative pain especially at 24 h.