International orthopaedics · 2025
Preoperative anxiety assessment in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Opplert Jules, Eon Pauline, Delforge Etienne, Noailles Thibaut, Hardy Alexandre, Morin Vincent, Bruchard Arnaud, Fontanier Vincent, Laplaud David
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Preoperative anxiety (Pop-Anx) is highly prevalent among patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Pop-Anx can stem from fears related to the procedure, anaesthesia, or the recovery process. It has been linked to poorer postoperative outcomes, including greater pain, reduced function, and a lower quality of life. Despite its clinical significance, Pop-Anx is inconsistently assessed due to a lack of standardized tools and clear guidelines. The objective was to identify instruments used for measuring Pop-Anx in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgeries.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across five databases up to September 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Data on anxiety assessment tools, timing, administration, and related outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted on studies with a low risk of bias using random-effects models.
RESULTS: Screening of the literature revealed that 42 studies assessed Pop-Anx, involving a total of 115,380 patients. Ten different tools were used to measure Pop-Anx, with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) being the most frequent. Significant variability was observed in assessment timing and methodology. A meta-analysis showed that Pop-Anx was positively correlated with postoperative anxiety (z = 0.60) and pain (z = 0.22) and negatively correlated with joint function (z = -0.25). Females reported higher Pop-Anx (g = 0.38). The timing of outcome assessment did not significantly moderate these relationships.
CONCLUSION: Although Pop-Anx is associated with worse postoperative outcomes, it is assessed using heterogeneous and sometimes inadequate tools. Standardized, context-specific assessment methods are needed. Despite its clinical relevance, Pop-Anx remains underassessed in some common orthopaedic procedures.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across five databases up to September 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Data on anxiety assessment tools, timing, administration, and related outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted on studies with a low risk of bias using random-effects models.
RESULTS: Screening of the literature revealed that 42 studies assessed Pop-Anx, involving a total of 115,380 patients. Ten different tools were used to measure Pop-Anx, with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) being the most frequent. Significant variability was observed in assessment timing and methodology. A meta-analysis showed that Pop-Anx was positively correlated with postoperative anxiety (z = 0.60) and pain (z = 0.22) and negatively correlated with joint function (z = -0.25). Females reported higher Pop-Anx (g = 0.38). The timing of outcome assessment did not significantly moderate these relationships.
CONCLUSION: Although Pop-Anx is associated with worse postoperative outcomes, it is assessed using heterogeneous and sometimes inadequate tools. Standardized, context-specific assessment methods are needed. Despite its clinical relevance, Pop-Anx remains underassessed in some common orthopaedic procedures.