Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2023
Impact of calcified nodule on target lesion failure after stent implantation in hemodialysis patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matsuhiro Yutaka, Nakamura Daisuke, Dohi Tomoharu, Ishihara Takayuki, Okamoto Naotaka, Mizote Isamu, Mano Toshiaki, Nishino Masami, Sakata Yasushi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Little is known about intravascular imaging predictors of cardiac events after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We aimed to reveal the association between calcified nodules (CN) and target lesion failure (TLF) in HD patients after DES implantation.
METHODS: We enrolled 114 HD patients who underwent DES implantation between October 2016 and October 2020. The patients were divided into a CN group (39%, 44 patients) and a non-CN group (61%, 70 patients). The primary endpoint was the incidence of TLF, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization.
RESULTS: HD duration was longer, and the calcium burden was higher in the CN group than in the non-CN group. Over a median follow-up of 607 days [interquartile range: 349-965 days], the cumulative incidence curve showed that the CN group had a significantly higher incidence of TLF than the non-CN group (31.8% vs. 11.4% within 3 years, p = 0.008). On Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard model analysis, the CN group was associated with an increased rate of TLF (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-6.75, p = 0.016). An in-stent CN was observed in 73% of the lesions with target lesion revascularization in the CN group, whereas no in-stent CN was observed in the non-CN group (p = 0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: CN was an independent predictor of TLF in patients undergoing HD. In-stent CN was an important cause of TLF after DES implantation in CN lesions in HD patients; therefore, a different strategy should be considered for treating the lesions.
METHODS: We enrolled 114 HD patients who underwent DES implantation between October 2016 and October 2020. The patients were divided into a CN group (39%, 44 patients) and a non-CN group (61%, 70 patients). The primary endpoint was the incidence of TLF, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization.
RESULTS: HD duration was longer, and the calcium burden was higher in the CN group than in the non-CN group. Over a median follow-up of 607 days [interquartile range: 349-965 days], the cumulative incidence curve showed that the CN group had a significantly higher incidence of TLF than the non-CN group (31.8% vs. 11.4% within 3 years, p = 0.008). On Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard model analysis, the CN group was associated with an increased rate of TLF (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-6.75, p = 0.016). An in-stent CN was observed in 73% of the lesions with target lesion revascularization in the CN group, whereas no in-stent CN was observed in the non-CN group (p = 0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: CN was an independent predictor of TLF in patients undergoing HD. In-stent CN was an important cause of TLF after DES implantation in CN lesions in HD patients; therefore, a different strategy should be considered for treating the lesions.