DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2017.10.020
Detection of clinically occult primary tumours in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumours: comparison of three-dimensional THRIVE MRI, two-dimensional spin-echo MRI, and contrast-enhanced CT.
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate and compare the utility of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted high-resolution isotropic volume examination (THRIVE), spin-echo (SE) T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) for detecting clinically occult primary tumours in patients with cervical lymph node metastases.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Seventy-three consecutive patients with tumours that went undetected during endoscopic or physical examinations underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI (SE and 3D THRIVE) after gadolinium injection. Guided biopsy results served as reference standards. The diagnostic performances of the imaging techniques were compared with McNemar's tests.
RESULTS
Primary tumours were identified in 59 (80.8%) of the 73 patients after surgery. Of these, 36 were found in the palatine tonsil, 11 in the base of the tongue, seven in the nasopharynx, and five in the pyriform sinus. The sensitivity (72.9%) and accuracy (71.2%) of 3D THRIVE for detecting primary tumours were higher than were those of SE T1-weighted MRI (49.2% and 53.4%, p≤0.002) or CT (36.4% and 46.4%, p≤0.001). The specificities of these techniques did not differ. The diagnostic performance of 3D THRIVE (area under the curve [AUC]=0.681) for detecting tumours did not differ from that of SE T1-weighted MRI or CT (AUC=0.671 and 0.608, p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
3D THRIVE was more sensitive at detecting primary tumours than was SE T1-weighted MRI or CT in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumours. This sequence may improve biopsy and therapeutic planning in these patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.